MHB High school simple algebra word problem

randyrandy
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
The 100W light bulb (cost 0.60 dollars) is not going to be used anymore and is being replaced with the 20W (cost 3 dollars) low energy light bulb.
If electricity is charged at $0.15 per kWh, for how many hours must the low energy bulb be used in order for the lower cost of running it to exactly compensate for its higher initial cost?

A. 0.25
B 250.00
C 200.00
D 160.00
E 720.00

answer: D 160.00

why?

On first appearance you would think:
0.60 + 0.1 * 0.15 * t = 3.00 + 0.02 * 0.15 * t
t = 200

But that's the wrong answer. That's one of the trap choices.

How do you get to 160?

What am I misunderstanding or missing?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I agree with your solution ... 200 hrs.
 
help please said:
The 100W light bulb (cost 0.60 dollars) is not going to be used anymore and is being replaced with the 20W (cost 3 dollars) low energy light bulb.
If electricity is charged at $0.15 per kWh, for how many hours must the low energy bulb be used in order for the lower cost of running it to exactly compensate for its higher initial cost?

A. 0.25
B 250.00
C 200.00
D 160.00
E 720.00

answer: D 160.00

why?

On first appearance you would think:
0.60 + 0.1 * 0.15 * t = 3.00 + 0.02 * 0.15 * t
t = 200

But that's the wrong answer. That's one of the trap choices.

How do you get to 160?

What am I misunderstanding or missing?
If you already have a 100W light bulb that is not going to be used anymore, then you don't need to spend $0.60 on a new one. So I would leave out the term 0.60 in the equation, which then becomes
0.1 * 0.15 * t = 3.00 + 0.02 * 0.15 * t.

But that leads to the answer t = 250. I don't see any way to get the answer 160 unless there is some further information that has been omitted from the question.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top