High voltage supercapacitor is possible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of achieving high voltage in supercapacitors, particularly by integrating high-k materials like ferroelectric capacitors. Participants explore the limitations and potential of current supercapacitor technology, including energy density, dielectric breakdown, and the use of alternative materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the energy density of supercapacitors is related to the square of their voltage and question the possibility of combining supercapacitors with high voltage capabilities.
  • Concerns about dielectric breakdown are raised, noting that achieving large capacitance requires very close plate spacing, which could lead to material failure due to high forces between opposite charges.
  • Participants discuss a specific project related to supercapacitors and question whether replacing carbon with materials like barium titanate could allow for higher voltage charging beyond the typical limits of carbon supercapacitors.
  • One participant mentions that the current state-of-the-art supercapacitors are limited to around 2.8 volts per cell due to thin dielectrics and highlights the need for balancing circuits in series configurations to manage leakage variations.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of using nano-scale spacing in supercapacitors, with some arguing that high electric fields could lead to charge leakage regardless of the dielectric material used.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the nature of carbon in supercapacitors, with some stating that carbon is not a dielectric and that supercapacitors utilize an electric double layer instead.
  • Participants explore the trade-off between increasing the spacing between plates to potentially increase voltage and the resulting loss of capacitance.
  • A question is raised about calculating the theoretical capacitance of a supercapacitor based on its surface area per gram, prompting a mathematical inquiry into ideal utilization of surface area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the potential for high voltage in supercapacitors, the role of materials, and the implications of design choices. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the best approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about material properties, the dependence on specific configurations, and unresolved mathematical considerations regarding capacitance calculations.

Stanley514
Messages
404
Reaction score
2
Energy density of supercap is equal to square of it`s voltage.
Is it possible to join together advantages of supercaps and high voltage
capacitors such as Ferroelectric caps?
What prevents to use high-k materials in supercaps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dielectric brakedown. To have large capacitance, you need your plates to be very close to one another (micrometer or nanometer range). Now imagine having opposite charges so close to one another - the forces are enormous and the material will break, or in the best case, leak.
 
What do you think on following project:
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22297/"
Do you think it is going to fail?
Well,we could charge usual carbon supercap up to 4 volts only,
But carbon is far from best dielectric materials.Do you want to say
that if we will replace carbon with such material as barium titanate
it is not going to be charged even up to 30 volts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The present state-of-the-art (an example is Maxwell UltraCapacitor) is limited in voltage per cell of 2.8 volts because, as Curl reported, of the thin dielectric. The maximum capacitance however is 3000 farads (not micro, but farads). In order to use in most any application these are put into banks, both series and parallel, until the needed operating voltage (series) and capacitance (parallel). The only fly in this ointment is that the cells require a balancing circuit due to internal variations in leakage. This leakage, if unchecked, will allow some cells to exceed the 2.8 volt limit. Leakage current is microamps so any variation in internal resistance will cause a large voltage variation.
 
Stanley514 said:
What do you think on following project:
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22297/"
Do you think it is going to fail?
Well,we could charge usual carbon supercap up to 4 volts only,
But carbon is far from best dielectric materials.Do you want to say
that if we will replace carbon with such material as barium titanate
it is not going to be charged even up to 30 volts?

30 volts with nano-scale spacing is a very large field. No matter what material you put in between (or even a vacuum) will allow charge to jump across if the field is strong enough.
Even if this doesn't occur, like I said, it will leak charge and the capacitor will discharge by just sitting there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stanley514 said:
Well,we could charge usual carbon supercap up to 4 volts only,
But carbon is far from best dielectric materials.Do you want to say
that if we will replace carbon with such material as barium titanate
it is not going to be charged even up to 30 volts?

Carbon is not a dielectric at all. Supercapacitors don't have a dielectric. They use an electric double layer instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_double-layer_capacitor
 
Carbon is not a dielectric at all. Supercapacitors don't have a dielectric. They use an electric double layer instead.
So what we would theoretically to do to increase voltage of supercup?
Find another electrolyte?
 
You increase space between plates... but if you do that, you lose capacitance. Its a trade.
 
How could we calculate theoretical capacitance of supercapacitor (in Farads/g) knowing
its surface area per gram?For example surface are is 2.000 m2/g.What would be capacitance if all this area is ideally utilized?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K