Hodge duality and differential forms

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Hodge duality and differential forms in the context of a specific mathematical expression involving a complex function and a 1-form. Participants explore the implications of calculating the Hodge star of a differential form and the conditions under which certain terms in a derived equation can be set to zero.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation involving a complex function and a 1-form, leading to the calculation of $$d\star A=0$$ and proposes that this implies certain conditions on the Laplacian of the terms involved.
  • Another participant questions the context, suggesting that the discussion may be situated within a Lorentzian manifold or Minkowski space, and seeks clarification on the meaning of $$\nabla^2$$.
  • A third participant clarifies that $$\nabla^2$$ refers to the normal Laplacian in three-dimensional space, with a specific choice of time coordinate to define a 1-form.
  • Further, a participant suggests that using the relationship $$\Delta = \left( d + d^* \right)^2$$ might be beneficial and cautions against the notation of $$\nabla^2$$ in the context of Cartan calculus, as it may lead to confusion regarding the application of the connection.
  • Finally, the original poster seeks validation of their procedure, specifically whether it is correct to assume that all terms must equal zero in the derived equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the notation and the context of the discussion, with no consensus reached on the correctness of the original poster's procedure or the implications of setting terms to zero.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of the operators used and the specific mathematical context (e.g., whether the setting is Newtonian or Lorentzian). The notation and terminology may lead to ambiguity in interpretation.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
If we have,$$A=d[(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)(dt+\lambda)]$$
where $$\alpha$$ is a complex function and $$\lambda$$ is a 1-form. t here represents the time coordinate.

If we want to calculate $$d\star A=0$$ where $$\star$$ is hodge star, we get if I did my calculations correctly $$\nabla^2[(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)(dt+\lambda)]=0$$

From the product rule, we get $$(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)\nabla^2(dt+\lambda)+ (dt+\lambda)\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha) +2 \nabla^2(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)\nabla^2(dt+\lambda)=0$$
Does it mean here that each term must equal zero and thus since $$(\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)$$ can not be zero in the first term so $$\nabla^2(dt+\lambda)=0$$ thus killing with it the third term in the equation and only leaving the second term?
That is simplifying the above equation, we get, $$(dt+\lambda)\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)=0$$ thus leaving us with $$\nabla^2 (\bar{\alpha}-\alpha)=0$$

Can this step be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you're working on a Lorentzian manifold, Minkowski space?
What is ##\nabla^2##, the Hodge-Laplacian?

If you're doing physics, why choose a particular "time coordinate"?
 
$$\nabla^2$$ is the normal laplacian of (x,y,z). t is chosen like this such that dt is a 1 form.
 
Right, so you're working in a Newtonian spacetime. Maybe using the fact that
$$\Delta = \left( d + d^* \right)^2 = d d^* + d^* d $$
with ##d^*## being the codifferential will help. Btw, if you're doing Cartan calculus ##\nabla^2## is a bad notation for the Hodge-Laplace / Laplace-Beltrami operator, because it suggests that you're applying the connection twice.
 
So yes, considering that I used this notation istead of $\nabla^2$ is my final answer correct or at least is the procedure correct that I considered all terms must be set equal to zero?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K