Homework Help: Calculating Moment of Inertia & Radius of Gyration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia and radius of gyration using the formulas r = √(I/m) and the parallel axis theorem. The user is initially uncertain about the moments calculated about the center of mass (CM) and the hip, questioning the incorporation of acceleration and distance to the toe. Clarifications are provided, confirming that the moment about the hip can be calculated as m*0.42^2 + m*0.24^2. The conversation also addresses the relationship between tangential acceleration and angular acceleration, concluding that if tangential acceleration is 18 m/s², the angular acceleration is also 18 radians/s². The final calculations are affirmed, leading to a resolution of the user's queries.
lupinpooter
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3KMRh.jpg

eFqdu.jpg

Oiq2y.jpg


Homework Equations



radius of gyration:
r = root (I/m)
I = moment of inertia
m = mass

parallel axis theorem given above

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I think the moment about CM is just m*0.24^2, but after that, I'm less sure.
Is the moment about the hip just m*0.42^2 + m*0.24^2?

If so, it's taking the acceleration and the distance to the toe into account that I'm having difficulty with. Is it just F = ma? If so, is the m taken from the moment of inertia at the hip, or the toe? I figure the distance to the toe must be significant, but I don't know how to account for it.

Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lupinpooter said:
Okay, so I think the moment about CM is just m*0.24^2, but after that, I'm less sure.
Is the moment about the hip just m*0.42^2 + m*0.24^2?
Yes, you've got it.

If so, it's taking the acceleration and the distance to the toe into account that I'm having difficulty with. Is it just F = ma? If so, is the m taken from the moment of inertia at the hip, or the toe?
How would you write the equivalent of F = ma for rotational motion?
I figure the distance to the toe must be significant, but I don't know how to account for it.
Given the tangential acceleration, how would you find the angular acceleration?
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, you've got it.


How would you write the equivalent of F = ma for rotational motion?

Given the tangential acceleration, how would you find the angular acceleration?

Okay, maybe it's best to do the last two bits in reverse order;
if the tangential acceleration is 18m/s^2, and the radius is 1m, is the angular acceleration also 18 radians/s^2?

Then is the moment: angular acceleration * the moment about the hip?
And that's the final answer?
 
lupinpooter said:
Okay, maybe it's best to do the last two bits in reverse order;
if the tangential acceleration is 18m/s^2, and the radius is 1m, is the angular acceleration also 18 radians/s^2?
Right!

Then is the moment: angular acceleration * the moment about the hip?
And that's the final answer?
Right again.
 
Awesome,
thanks man, I really appreciate it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top