Homework Help: Calculating Moment of Inertia & Radius of Gyration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia and radius of gyration using the formulas r = √(I/m) and the parallel axis theorem. The user is initially uncertain about the moments calculated about the center of mass (CM) and the hip, questioning the incorporation of acceleration and distance to the toe. Clarifications are provided, confirming that the moment about the hip can be calculated as m*0.42^2 + m*0.24^2. The conversation also addresses the relationship between tangential acceleration and angular acceleration, concluding that if tangential acceleration is 18 m/s², the angular acceleration is also 18 radians/s². The final calculations are affirmed, leading to a resolution of the user's queries.
lupinpooter
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3KMRh.jpg

eFqdu.jpg

Oiq2y.jpg


Homework Equations



radius of gyration:
r = root (I/m)
I = moment of inertia
m = mass

parallel axis theorem given above

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I think the moment about CM is just m*0.24^2, but after that, I'm less sure.
Is the moment about the hip just m*0.42^2 + m*0.24^2?

If so, it's taking the acceleration and the distance to the toe into account that I'm having difficulty with. Is it just F = ma? If so, is the m taken from the moment of inertia at the hip, or the toe? I figure the distance to the toe must be significant, but I don't know how to account for it.

Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lupinpooter said:
Okay, so I think the moment about CM is just m*0.24^2, but after that, I'm less sure.
Is the moment about the hip just m*0.42^2 + m*0.24^2?
Yes, you've got it.

If so, it's taking the acceleration and the distance to the toe into account that I'm having difficulty with. Is it just F = ma? If so, is the m taken from the moment of inertia at the hip, or the toe?
How would you write the equivalent of F = ma for rotational motion?
I figure the distance to the toe must be significant, but I don't know how to account for it.
Given the tangential acceleration, how would you find the angular acceleration?
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, you've got it.


How would you write the equivalent of F = ma for rotational motion?

Given the tangential acceleration, how would you find the angular acceleration?

Okay, maybe it's best to do the last two bits in reverse order;
if the tangential acceleration is 18m/s^2, and the radius is 1m, is the angular acceleration also 18 radians/s^2?

Then is the moment: angular acceleration * the moment about the hip?
And that's the final answer?
 
lupinpooter said:
Okay, maybe it's best to do the last two bits in reverse order;
if the tangential acceleration is 18m/s^2, and the radius is 1m, is the angular acceleration also 18 radians/s^2?
Right!

Then is the moment: angular acceleration * the moment about the hip?
And that's the final answer?
Right again.
 
Awesome,
thanks man, I really appreciate it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top