Homework SolutionEigenvalue of a Matrix: Proof Involving Nonsingular Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter chocolatefrog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalue Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that if (I + A) is nonsingular, then (I - A)(I + A)⁻¹ = (I + A)⁻¹(I - A), establishing that (I - A)/(I + A) is defined. The initial proof attempts to show this by defining A and B, leading to the conclusion that A = B. However, a key point raised is the uncertainty regarding the invertibility of (I - A), which could invalidate the proof. The participant later clarifies that A is skew-symmetric, allowing the assumption that (I - A) is nonsingular. The discussion seeks to identify any remaining errors in the proof process.
chocolatefrog
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Proof involving nonsingular matrices.

Homework Statement



If (I + A) is nonsingular, prove that (I - A)(I + A)-1 = (I + A)-1(I - A), and hence (I - A)/(I + A) is defined for the matrix.

I've proved it like this:

Let (I - A)(I + A)-1 = A, and (I + A)-1(I - A) = B.
B-1 = (I - A)-1(I + A)
B-1A = I
Premultiplying by B, we get A = B.

Is this proof correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


chocolatefrog said:

Homework Statement



If (I + A) is nonsingular, prove that (I - A)(I + A)-1 = (I + A)-1(I - A), and hence (I - A)/(I + A) is defined for the matrix.

I've proved it like this:

Let (I - A)(I + A)-1 = A, and (I + A)-1(I - A) = B.
B-1 = (I - A)-1(I + A)
B-1A = I
Premultiplying by B, we get A = B.

Is this proof correct?

You don't know that I-A is invertible. So (I-A)-1 might not exist.
 


micromass said:
You don't know that I-A is invertible. So (I-A)-1 might not exist.

Oh, I forgot to mention that A is known to be skew-symmetric. So, (I - A)T = (I + A), which is nonsingular. And since a matrix is nonsingular iff its transpose is nonsingular, we could assume that (I - A)-1 exists.

I can't seem to think beyond this point. If there's still an error somewhere in the proof, could you please point to it?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top