Homogenization of a plate to an equivalent rod .

AI Thread Summary
To convert a steel plate into an equivalent rod with the same stiffness, first calculate the plate's deflection under load and derive its stiffness. Set the plate stiffness equal to the rod stiffness, defined by the formula kr = E*A/L, where E is the modulus of elasticity, A is the cross-sectional area, and L is the length of the rod. You can choose any two of these parameters to solve for the third. The plate and rod will not generally have the same mass unless an additional constraint is applied to match their densities and volumes. This approach allows for a systematic way to achieve equivalent stiffness while considering mass differences.
perfectz
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Homogenization of a plate to an equivalent rod...

Folks, I have a doubt... Sorry if it is a really stupid one...:rolleyes:

Imagine you have a steel plate say 200mm by 200mm in dimension, with a stiffness of say some "k" N/mm...

Is there any formula to convert that plate into an equivalent steel rod with the same stiffness of "k" N/mm?...

Waiting for your answers.....:bugeye:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First, compute the plate deflection under the applied load. Then divide the applied load by the plate deflection to obtain the plate stiffness, kp. Now set kp equal to the rod stiffness, kr, where kr = E*A/L, E = rod modulus of elasticity, A = rod cross-sectional area, and L = rod length. For the three parameters E, A, and L, arbitrarily set any two of these parameters, and solve for the third.
 


Ok thanks buddy... Thank you very much...
 


will the plate and rod have the same mass after homogenization? It won't right?
 
The plate and rod generally will not have the same mass. You could design them to concurrently have the same mass by introducing an additional constraint equation, rhor*Vr = mp, where rhor = rod density, Vr = rod volume, and mp = plate mass.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top