Solving for Force with Hooke's Law: What Am I Doing Wrong?

AI Thread Summary
A spring with a spring constant of k=45 N/m is initially stretched to 0.35m by a 1.0 kg mass, but the correct length of the spring when the mass is removed is 0.13m. The user struggles to reconcile the calculations using Hooke's Law, F = -kx, and is confused by the force values derived from the spring's stretch. They calculate the force for both lengths but find discrepancies when comparing to the expected mass of 1.0 kg. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between force, spring constant, and displacement in applying Hooke's Law correctly. Ultimately, the user receives clarification on the calculations needed to resolve their confusion.
catch.yossarian
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A spring with k=45 N/m is .35m when pulled
down with a 1.0 kg mass, what is the length of the
spring when the mass is taken off? The answer in the
back of the book is .13m (13 cm), I can't for the life
of me figure out how they get that.

I know that Hooke's Law is: F = -kx

What I've done so far:

F = (45)(.35) = 15.75 ---> Force it takes to pull down .35 meters, apparently using 1.0kg. Thus, if I divide 15.75 by 9.81, I should get 1.0kg, yes?

15.75 / 9.81 = 1.60 ---> :bugeye:

I must be doing something wrong, let's start backwards.

F = (45)(.13) = 5.85 --> Force it takes to pull down .13 meters (this x is the answer, but right now I'm trying to find a proper F). 5.85 / 9.81 = .56, again, not 1.0kg. :(

What am I doing wrong? Can anybody point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the spring without the mass.It has the length x_{0}.When acted by a force,its length is x.Hooke's law says that the magnitude of the force is proportional to the the length the spring is stretched under the influence of the force:
F_{el}=k\Delta x=k(x-x_{0})

Compute the force and \Delta x,then use the expression for the latter to solve your problem.

Daniel.
 
Got it, thanks!

Man, such a small thing, too.
*sigh of relief*
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top