How accurate is pulse width as a measure of response time for a pin photodiode?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the accuracy of pulse width as a measure of response time for a pin photodiode, specifically the s5973 model. It highlights that the rise time is influenced by terminal capacitance, diffusion time of carriers, and carrier transit time. Despite having a calculated rise time of 0.35 ns, the user experiences a broader pulse of 20 ns when measuring a 10 ns laser pulse. Suggestions include verifying the actual pulse width, adjusting the reverse bias voltage, and checking for stray capacitances in the circuit. The conversation emphasizes that pulse width is a crude measure of response time, and better accuracy can be achieved with improved signal-to-noise ratio and appropriate bandwidth reduction techniques.
apuz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For a pin photodiode, risetime=bandwidth/0.35
i get ~3ns for s5973
will it be affecting the measurement of 10ns laser pulse?
How can i reduce the rise time?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
apuz, Welcome to Physics Forums!

The response speed of a photodiode is a measure of the time required for the accumulated charge to become an external current and is generally expressed as the rise time or cut-off frequency. The rise time is the time required for the output signal to change from 10 % to 90 % of the peak output value and is determined by the following factors:

1) Terminal capacitance Ct and time constant t1 of load resistance RL
2) Diffusion time t2 of carriers generated outside the depletion layer
3) Carrier transit time t3 in the depletion layer

For exact details see section 3-2 of this application note:

http://sales.hamamatsu.com/assets/html/ssd/si-photodiode/index.htm

Hope this helps.
 
hi Bobby, thank you 4 your interest.

the link gives me a rise time of 0.35ns.Which seems not to create problems of broadening.But when we try to measure a 10ns pulse using this s5973, it is giving a broader pulse of 20ns. We did ensure the following:
1)1 Ghz oscilloscope
2)50 ohms coaxial cable
3)50 ohms dc coupling on oscilloscope
4)3.3 supply@ which terminal impedance is min

any help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
apuz, the first question I have is: How do you know your laser pulse input is 10nS? It may actually be 20 nS!

If you can be sure the input is 10 nS, you might try adjusting the reverse bias voltage on the APD. You might try to raise it up a bit while watching that pulse on the oscilloscope for any changes. Stray capacitances (unplanned) will spread out high risetime signals...check your circuit layout/groundplane. One more thing...you may get a new (different) s5973 and see what happens.

Sorry not much help. Last thought: contact Hammatsu applications engineers. They will be interested in solving this, I think.
 
the pulse width was measured by the people who installed it. They used a black box kind of thing and didn't reveal what it is.
 
"pulse width" is a very crude measure of effective response time - a bit like the Rayleigh Criterion for telescopes etc.. You can do much better than the 'rise time' accuracy if you have a good SNR or reduce your measurement bandwidth appropriately with synchronous detection etc.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top