How Accurate Is the Estimated Ionization Energy Formula for Hydrogen?

CatWoman
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Estimate the energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom and hence deduce an approximate formula for the ionization energy of hydrogen. How accurate is your formula?


Homework Equations


Don't know but it is in the field of quantum mechanics


The Attempt at a Solution



Ionisation Energy is energy required to remove an electron.

Electrostatic Potential (energy per unit charge) V=q/(4πε_0 r)= e/(4πε_0 r)

For a Bohr atom (Z=1), energy required to remove an electron from the atom with a nucleus of charge e and a radius r0 is the Electrostatic Potential Energy:

PE=qV = e^2/(4πε_0 r)×1/e
=(1.6×10^(-19))/(4π×8.85×10^(-12)×10^(-15) )
=1.4MeV

The equation estimates the distance of the electron from the proton in the nucleus as a precise value – this is not the case. An electron’s position is given by a wave-function probability density and it is in effect occupying the whole of the atom at once.

IS ANY OF THIS RIGHT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.4MeV is about 100,000 times too large.

I think it's because your radius appears to be 100,000 times too small.

You are right that this semi-classical model of the electron is wrong, but you can get a good estimate of the ionization energy using this. And I think that's what the question asks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top