How Are Goldstone Bosons Formed in Chiral Symmetry Breaking?

Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Dear PF,

Could anyone help me to understand the following issue:

I don't understand the formation of Goldston bosons in chiral symmmetry breaking. Namely - suppose there is only fermion fields Lagrangian and due to some reasons the fermion field obteins VEV - <0|psi^bar psi|0> is non zero. And left/right chiral symmetry is reduced to its diagonal group.
I don't understant how Goldstone bosons are formed - I mean as folows"
In Scalar field case if we have multiple fields phi1, phi2, phi3... and when
this scalalar field develops some VEV - v, then for convience we can put only phi1 equals to this VEV -v, rest fields we can put zero...we will say this VEV of field phi1 is v, VEVs of rest field are zero: <0|phi1|0>=v,
<0|phi2|0>=0 etc. We say we have phi1 massive scalar field and rest Goldsone Bosons from Broken Symmetry.

So I don't understand what happens when suppose fermion fields develop VEV.

Thanks
George
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The story goes as follows, the vacuum expectation value of certain composite fields break a continuous symmetry of the Lagrangian and Goldstone bosons emerge for each of the unbroken generators. I suspect this is what you have in mind anyway, so let me talk specifically about chiral QCD with the light quarks (u, d, s). The Lagrangian for the quark part of the theory is \mathcal{L} = \bar{Q}_R i \gamma^\mu D_\mu Q_R + \bar{Q}_L i \gamma^\mu D_\mu Q_L. Clearly the whole thing is invariant under the chiral transformation SU(3)_L \times SU(3)_R because we've left out the quark mass terms. Now, when you look at composite operators like \bar{Q}^a_R Q^b_L (a,b are flavor indices) you find that these operators acquire a vacuum expectation. In this case the vev originates from the non-perturbative part of QCD. The full chiral symmetry is broken down to the subgroup SU(3)_V just as you said, and the vacuum expectation value can be written like \langle \bar{Q}^a_R Q^b_L \rangle = v \delta^{a b}. In order to describe fluctuations of the operator \bar{Q}^a_R Q^b_L one introduces another field \Phi which is an SU(3) matrix defined via \bar{Q}_R Q_L \rightarrow v \Phi. Because it is a member of SU(3) it can be written in terms the exponential of (i times) a traceless hermitian matrix. Such a hermitian matrix has 8 independent components, one for each of the broken generators, and each one corresponds to one of the massless Goldstone bosons. These fields are your pions, your kaons, and the eta, and they represent the low energy excitations of the system. That's how the Goldstone modes appear in the theory. They can be given mass by including the effects of quark masses to leading order, and then they are referred to as pseudo-Goldstone bosons because the chiral symmetry which would be spontaneuously broken by the vev is explicitly broken by the quark masses.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top