How Are Resultants Calculated for Parallel vs Perpendicular Distributed Loads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigertan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributed
AI Thread Summary
Resultants for parallel distributed loads are calculated differently than for perpendicular loads. For parallel loads, the resultant force is determined by the cumulative effect of forces along the beam, increasing from left to right. This means that the force at any point is the sum of all forces to its left. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate calculations in structural analysis. Properly accounting for these differences ensures correct load distribution and structural integrity.
tigertan
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi there,


Parallel distributed loads are throwing me off a little at the moment. Is the resultant worked out the same way as for those with distributed loads perpendicular to a beam??


Picture included.

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 509
Engineering news on Phys.org
lotsa views yet no help..

please post a reply??
 
An axial distributed load such as you've drawn would have a cumulative effect, so the force at the right end of the beam would be the sum of all forces to its left. In effect, you've drawn a force which increases with position from left to right.
 
Last edited:
Thx :)
 

Thread 'Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)'

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
View full post »

Thread 'Dry sump pump issue'

I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to reduce a distributed load to a resultant force
Replies
6
Views
4K
How Can I Account for Wind Loading in Calculating Buckling Load on a Beam?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why Use the Parallel Axis Theorem with the Second Moment of AREA?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Engineering 2nd Degree Inderteminacy for Structure Using Force Method
Replies
3
Views
2K
What is the distance of the resultant from point A on the beam?
Replies
1
Views
6K
Generator load sharing
Replies
4
Views
2K
How do I calculate the deflection of an L-shaped pipeline with added loads?
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Finding yield strength with a load/displacement curve
Replies
5
Views
2K
Area Distribution Around Stays in EN 12953 Boiler Standard (10.2.8)
Replies
0
Views
550
Engineering Statics, Finding Reaction forces for A and H
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top