How can hydrostatic pressure drop to zero?

AI Thread Summary
Hydrostatic pressure is fundamentally due to gravity, and its behavior can change based on the dynamics of fluid flow and resistance within a vessel. When blood flows through a constricted area, hydrostatic pressure can drop due to the conversion of pressure into kinetic energy, illustrating the relationship between hydrostatic and dynamic pressure. The discussion highlights that hydrostatic pressure is often confused with static pressure, especially in medical contexts, where it can be influenced by arterial and venous pressures. The interaction of hydrostatic pressure with fluid dynamics is crucial for understanding how pressure varies in different conditions. Ultimately, the nuances of hydrostatic pressure reflect its dependence on both gravitational forces and the flow characteristics of the fluid.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

capillary_microcirculation.jpg


If this is a vessel the hydrostatic pressure would drop along the vessel due to resistance. My question is why does hydrostatic pressure drop if hydrostatic pressure is due to gravity. Gravity is always there, even if the molecules lose hydrostatic energy, they would gain it back due to gravity?

Also why is this called hydrostatic pressure, the gravity is acting down, and the pressure is acting other way. I don't get it.

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hydrostatic pressure is due to gravity only, not due to motion, so resistance is irrelevant and it doesn't drop to zero.

If you prop a dead person up against a wall, the only pressure (gauge pressure) left in their blood vessels is hydrostatic.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
Hydrostatic pressure is due to gravity only, not due to motion, so resistance is irrelevant and it doesn't drop to zero.

If you prop a dead person up against a wall, the only pressure (gauge pressure) left in their blood vessels is hydrostatic.

Hey thanks Russ I appreciate the help :smile: but in my textbook it say if constrict the area where blood enters the vessel, the hydrostatic pressure drops. Ok I don't want to know why it is just that hydrostatic pressure keeps changing in certain conditions. If it is due to gravity why is it changing, I'm starting to doubt that hydrostatic pressure in this diagram is not due to gravity?

Here the diagram shows that if hydrostatic pressure if greater molecules inside the vessel would go out, but I'm getting confused how a moving fluid can have hydrostatic pressure. If water sits on a cup at rest, I can understand hydrostatic pressure? Why are they getting hydrostatic pressure involved with vessels, when static pressure is more appropriate?
 
[edit] Er, wait - if blood is flowing, then this is not a static situation and you can indeed exchange [hydro]static and dynamic pressure. You do still have the wiki for Bernoulli's principle handy, right...?
 
russ_watters said:
[edit] Er, wait - if blood is flowing, then this is not a static situation and you can indeed exchange [hydro]static and dynamic pressure. You do still have the wiki for Bernoulli's principle handy, right...?

Thanks again. This is a quote

Capillary Hydrostatic Pressure (PC )

This pressure drives fluid out of the capillary (i.e., filtration), and is highest at the arteriolar end of the capillary and lowest at the venular end.

Edit: Didn't see your edit, I understand bernoulli, static and dynamic pressure but your sentence is bit unclear for me. Are you saying hydrostatic is actually static pressure when blood is flowing?
 
Googling, it looks like they are using the term differently than is my understanding for fluid dynamics. Here's the whole link: http://www.cvphysiology.com/Microcirculation/M012.htm

The rest of the quote related to the issue:
The average capillary hydrostatic pressure is determined by arterial and venous pressures (PA and PV), and by the ratio of post-to-precapillary resistances (RV/RA). An increase in either arterial or venous pressure will increase capillary pressure; however, a given change in PA is only about one-fifth as effective in changing PC as the same absolute change in PV. Because venous resistance is relatively low, changes in PV are readily transmitted back to the capillary, and conversely, because arterial resistance is relatively high, changes in PA are poorly transmitted downstream to the capillary.
It looks to me like they are describing static pressure, not hydrostatic pressure. The way I understand the definitions for fluid dynamics, hydrostatic pressure is a subset of static pressure. "Static pressure" is the pressure of a static fluid - meaning without direct influence from motion. But that pressure can be created in several ways:
1. By gravity.
2. By pressurization of a closed system (ie, a squeezed balloon).
3. By a pump.
4. By a device that converts velocity pressure to static pressure.

Here's a dictionary reference for "hydrostatic pressure" that seems to imply the engineering field and medical field use the same term to mean two different things: http://www.answers.com/topic/hydrostatic-pressure

But anyway, since you asked about the gravity part of the definition...

Imagine a pair of reservoirs, one above the other. A pipe extends from the bottom of the upper one down to just below the surface of the bottom one. A valve is in the middle of the pipe. The pipe is full of water (and is less than 35 feet long).

Case 1: The valve is closed. when the valve is closed, you have two pressures at work. Hydrostatic pressure at the valve would be from the weight of the water sitting on the valve. You also have the static pressure due to the atmosphere pushing down on the reservoirs. This is often treated as a regular static pressure (ie, a pressurized vessel), but if the altitude changes enough, it is more like a hydrostatic pressure. This pressure increases the pressure at the valve - from both above and below. From above, it is obvious. From below, it is the air pressure pushing down on the lower reservoir and pushing water up the pipe to the valve.

Case 2: Open the valve completely. The hydrostatic pressure still exists, but now it acts all the way down the pipe. The static pressure at the bottom of the pipe won't be due to the weight of the water though: since the valve is open, much of that pressure is converted to velocity pressure in making the water move from the top reservoir to the bottom one. And since the valve is open and the atmospheric pressure pushes against both reservoirs equally, it cancels out and you can ignore it.

Case 3: Close the valve partway. Now the valve creates a restriction that again causes it to support the weight of the water above it, similar to case 1...except this time it only supports some of the weight. Some of that hydrostaticpressure also goes to making the water move. How does that relate to the question in the OP? Because of the restriction, there is a static pressure loss (drop) across the valve. The hydrostatic pressure below the valve is lower than it is above the valve because the valve is supporting some of the water column above it.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top