Engineering How can I accurately calculate the power absorbed in a circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karaandnick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the power absorbed in a circuit, where one participant struggles with the integration method yielding 225uJ. Others suggest that a missing factor of 1/2 in the integration could lead to an incorrect result, with one noting the correct answer should be 37.5uJ. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying integration techniques and normalizing variables in the calculations. Participants share their approaches, emphasizing the value of collaboration in solving complex problems. Overall, the thread illustrates common pitfalls in circuit power calculations and the benefit of peer support in understanding them.
karaandnick
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I wish someone could tell me what I am doing wrong. I have tried using P=VI then integrating P from t1 to t2 where I get 225uJ but it keeps telling me I am wrong. Seems like a rather simple problem.


circuits.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
karaandnick said:
I wish someone could tell me what I am doing wrong. I have tried using P=VI then integrating P from t1 to t2 where I get 225uJ but it keeps telling me I am wrong. Seems like a rather simple problem.


circuits.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Welcome to the PF.

I think you left out a factor of 1/2 in the first part of the integration. I get half of your answer.
 
I think he's out by a factor of 6.

If you normalize everything it just comes down to \int_0^1 x(1-x) dx = 1/6

Doing it properly with V, I and tr in the equation you get \frac{V \, I \, t_r}{6}
 
uart said:
I think he's out by a factor of 6.

If you normalize everything it just comes down to \int_0^1 x(1-x) dx = 1/6

Doing it properly with V, I and tr in the equation you get \frac{V \, I \, t_r}{6}

Interesting approach. Did you try it just the standard way, though? The number for t is so small that the t^3 term after the integration is negligible (if I did it right), and only the t^2 term contributes to the answer...
 
I ended up figuring it out. I decided to write equations for the slopes of each line. So

for the voltage

-30/250x + 30

For current

30/250x
\int(-30/250x+30)(30/250x)dx from 0 to 250

Then multiply by 10^-3 to get in micro jewel

Comes to 37.5uJ

Crazy little problem but I am ME so not used to this sort of thing.
 
I just noticed everyone's approach worked, geniuses. Thanks for everything, its nice to know there are still people out there willing to help others. I will definitely write these approaches down in my book for later use.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top