Courses How Can I Improve Teaching Chemistry Concepts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_UG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Guidance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a university chemistry pre-course designed to prepare students for introductory chemistry. The instructor has covered essential topics such as significant figures, scientific notation, atomic structure, stoichiometry, and chemical bonding. For the remaining six hours of lectures, the instructor plans to cover the Bohr model, quantum mechanics, Lewis structures, molecular orbital theory, VSEPR theory, gas laws, and solution equilibrium. However, the instructor expresses concern about the clarity of their explanations, particularly regarding quantum mechanics, noting that students appeared confused during the lectures. Despite feeling disappointed with their performance, the instructor views the experience as a valuable learning opportunity.
Physics_UG
Gold Member
Messages
287
Reaction score
2
So I have been teaching this university chemistry pre-course that is meant to review all of the pre-req stuff needed for uchem 1 and the course is supposed to touch on some of the stuff the students will see in uchem 1. The course is 4 lectures, 3 hours/lecture. The last two lectures I covered really basic stuff. On the first lecture I covered all of the sig fig rules, scientific notation, SI system, unit conversions, and dimensional analysis. On the second lecture I discussed some of the experimental evidence that gives us a picture of the atomic structure (Thomson experiment, Rutherford experiment, etc), the definition of a mole, the definition of the amu and the standards used to define both quantities, and then I did a ton of stoichiometry problems and had them pair up in groups to work some on their own. I covered mass-mole, mass-molecule, and molecule-mole conversions, chemical equation balancing, stoichiometric calculations given a chemical reaction, limiting reagents, percent yield, and mass percent calculations. I also talked about the rules for naming binary ionic, binary covalent, and polyatomic atoms.

My question is, how do you recommend I spend the last 6 hours of lecture time in this course? Tomorrow I was planning on covering the bohr model and the qualtization of energy levels, and then I was going to discuss atomic/quantum orbital mechanics and how the orbitals fill. Then I figure I will talk about lewis structures, molecular orbital theory (orbital hybridization, sigma and pi bonds, etc), and maybe get into VSEPR theory if time permits. I will also go into more detail on non-covalent vs. polar-covalent vs. ionic bonding.

Friday I plan on covering the gas laws, solution equilibrium, the equilibrium constant, le chatlier's principle, calorimetry (hess law, heat capacity, etc), etc.

Do you think this is a good plan? Are there some things missing that I should consider adding in?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics_UG said:
My question is, how do you recommend I spend the last 6 hours of lecture time in this course? Tomorrow I was planning on covering the bohr model and the qualtization of energy levels, and then I was going to discuss atomic/quantum orbital mechanics and how the orbitals fill. Then I figure I will talk about lewis structures, molecular orbital theory (orbital hybridization, sigma and pi bonds, etc), and maybe get into VSEPR theory if time permits.
You hit my opinion right on the nose! I know a lot of people who struggle with part of Chemistry, it would definitely benefit someone going into U-Chem. Especially hybridization.
 
Well, the course is over. It went decent, but I think everything I explained came out garbled. lol. MY explanations seemed clear to me in my head when I explained the concepts to myself before giving the lectures, but when I got in front of the group and began speaking everything came out garbled...especially the quantum/orbital mechanics...I was getting lots of blank stares there.

All in all, I was rather disappointed in my performance. I guess it is a lesson learned, and it was good experience for me nonetheless.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top