How can I improve the efficiency of my Boomilever design?

  • Thread starter Thread starter koujidaisuki76
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on improving the efficiency of Boomilever designs for the Science Olympiad, specifically addressing the challenges of compression forces that lead to structural failure. Participants emphasize the importance of using materials like bass and balsa wood, and the application of techniques such as laminating wood to enhance strength. Key insights include the significance of the moment of inertia (I) in preventing buckling and the necessity of optimizing the design to distribute compressive forces effectively. Suggestions include using tapered beams and vertical bracing to increase stability and efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural mechanics, specifically Euler's buckling theory.
  • Familiarity with materials science, particularly the properties of bass and balsa wood.
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations and their application in structural design.
  • Experience with basic woodworking techniques and tools, including CA ZAP glue.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Euler buckling of columns" to understand critical load calculations.
  • Learn about the properties of different wood grains, specifically C-grain and A-grain balsa.
  • Explore techniques for laminating wood to enhance structural integrity.
  • Investigate the design principles of I-beams and their application in Boomilever construction.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students participating in the Science Olympiad, particularly those involved in Boomilever design, as well as educators and mentors guiding them in structural engineering concepts.

  • #31
will some of you post your boomilever attachment base pictures on here i can't figure out how to make mine
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm doing this as part of a class, not competing in the competition.
Have any of you tried a square boomilever, like the ones on a crane?
Also, laving an L with a connecting point from the top of the vertical truss to the end of the horizontal one seems to work best; wood loses strength per length in compression, but not in tension.

Also, what is "laminating" the wood?
 
  • #33
your just putting a coat of material on it. I tried this, and it didnt really make my boomileve any more sufficient. It didn't a significant amount more, however, it did weigh a lot more.
 
  • #34
Say Hello To 3100!
Woooottttt!
XD
 
  • #35
an efficiency score of 3100?? sounds a tad unbelievable. your boomilever would have to weigh less then 5 grams, and hold ALL of the weight. If your lying... -.- If your telling the truth...WAY TO GO!
 
  • #36
JC052341-- how do you make your base where the screw hooks to the board? My boomilever is always failure there.
 
  • #37
I would like to preface this statement with saying that I believe the Science Olympiad is a wonderful idea to stimulate and cultivate young interests in the sciences. That having been said; This past weekend my youngest daughter competed in an Olympiad held at Southern Illinois University in Edwardsville. Given the perameters of the boomilever competition, she decided on a design that not only relied on tension, but also compression. I must say it was a very elegant design. The rules stated that an attachment plate would need to accommodate two 1/4 holes for 2"x1/4" bolts with washers 20cm's apart. This was critical to her design. Upon arrival to this phase of the competition she is told only one hole would be provided for a bolt. This was instrumental to the failure of her design. Not having an anchor at the abutment caused a catastrophic failure at the lower attachment point. In her design, she used lamination methods throughout the structure making it not only incredibly strong, but incredibly light. Being it held 14.5kg with the handicap, I can only guess what it might have held with the perameters she was given. Bottom line is she is happy,so I am happy. But I know she would have liked to have won. comments from a proud father.
 
  • #38
hey guys, i don't want to beat anyone from California or New york, i just want to beat my teacher that pretty much stole my plans and built a boomilever with them, for another girl member on the team, and currently has an efficiency score of 888. My highest score as of now is 750, but that's not working! I would REALLY appreciate it if one of yall would help me.
 
  • #39
okay I'm working on this for a science olympiad in connecticut

my question is, with your 'scoring' formulas, is it mass supported (grams)/mass of boomilever (grams)? if so, how the hell do you support fifteen kilos with a five gram boomilever? or fifteen gram boomilever?

you must be doing something else, as a single twenty centimeter dowel weighs about ten grams if not more
 
  • #40
yes, mass held (in grams)/ mass boomilever (in grams). Very simple...OUR DESIGNS ROCK! I don't know how a 5 grams boomilever holds all of the weight (very suspicious if you ask me), but a 15 gram one seems possible. My best score now is just above 888 (haha, i beat that other chick by a couple points), and my boomilever weighs just under 16.9 grams. I am sure that if i lightened my load some, i could get it down to 15 grams...anyways...Its all about design and forethought. What is your best efficiency score (include mass held and weight of your boomilever).
 
  • #41
Hmmm well we haven't competed yet (this weekend) but our boomilever is 160 grams

In tests, without all the supports in place and the glue not set completely we got about 5 kilos haha but I'm going to go get pics of it and finish it...

Our base is a little large but I'm planning to pop a lot of holes in it to drop the weight

Thanks!
 
  • #42
k so just tested it and it held 6 kilos easy (no visible or audible signs of stress).

I couldn't find my postal scale so idk the exact mass of it. Buy it was 155 before I added some extra supports, then I drilled much of the base out.

Will have pics tomorrow if you're curious/wanna help. We threw a lot of different ideas into this that maybe you'll use idk
 
  • #43
bloomp said:
Hmmm well we haven't competed yet (this weekend) but our boomilever is 160 grams

In tests, without all the supports in place and the glue not set completely we got about 5 kilos haha but I'm going to go get pics of it and finish it...

Our base is a little large but I'm planning to pop a lot of holes in it to drop the weight

Thanks!

HOLY CRAP! 160 grams O.O .. and only 5 kilograms were supported...well, here's your problem: your design sux! - no offense or anything. You are most likely one of those people with no engineering skills whatsoever, and continue to add weight to your boomilever because you think that in the grand scheme of things, that extra weight would have helped.

Well...my team ins't going to nationals, and I am a senior, so ill give you some help.
 

Similar threads

How can I efficiently build a boomilever using only wood and glue?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
In need of some advice regarding Science Olympiad boomilever
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Optimal Cross Section for Handling Tension and Compression in Boomilever Design
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
Need help building a boomilever for my physics class?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Audio/Video Cancel noise from neighbor with loud bass
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
Is My Rope Bridge Design Safe? Seeking Feedback on My Plans
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Need help with balsa tower design
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Will My Cantilevered Countertop Design Prevent Sagging?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Woodworking: How I Built My Own End Tables from Scratch
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Best truss bridge design for this school project?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K