How can I incorporate a Li-ion CC/CV circuit with an LM317 to charge batteries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillyBobjoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using an LM317 to create a charging circuit for Li-ion batteries that incorporates both constant current (CC) and constant voltage (CV) phases. The user seeks clarification on whether to use separate circuits for CC and CV or to integrate them into one circuit. Suggestions include utilizing a low dropout regulator with a series resistor to manage the transition from CC to CV automatically, based on the battery voltage. The proposed method simplifies the design while ensuring that the charging process adheres to the necessary voltage and current specifications. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining a stable supply voltage for effective battery charging.
BillyBobjoe
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi All

i am thinking of using an LM317 to deliver a constant current (CC) of aprox 1A to li-ion batteries for charging. but as you may know it is then recommended to then apply a constant voltage (CV) once the constant current section has made the battery voltage 4.2V per cell. the constant voltage should be 4.2V and shoud terminate when the charge current has dropped to approx 0.1C.

my question is how do i switch from constant current to constant voltage at the required time. is it just a matter of switching of the CC circuit and turning on a CV circuit? I.E can i have two separate circuits one for CC and the other for CV and just turn them on and off as required. Or do they have to be incorporated within the one circuit and if so how?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm sure someone else will give you a more informed answer.

Just if your interested for off the shelf stuffs,, have you looked on digikey (or other supplier?) for li-ion chargers?
For example searching "lithium charger" on digikey got tons of small and dedicated chargers.
like this one http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/22036b.pdf
 
ya no thanks, but I'm looking for a circuit that i could build myself.
 
As long as you don't mind the current "set point" being somewhat approximate then what I normally do is just use a low dropout regulator to handle the float voltage (eg 4.2 volts) and then just a series resistor on the input side of the regulator to handle the constant current part. You need the overall supply voltage to be reasonably constant which may or maynot require a second regulator depending on what supply you've got. The main advantage of this method is that it's simple and the "switching" is automatic.

As an example, imagine that you had a somewhat constant supply voltage of say 8 volts and you connected that through a 3.3 ohm series resistor to the Vin terminal of a low dropout (or even better an ultra low dropout) adjustable regulator that is set for an output of 4.2 volts.

What happens is that when the battery is not fully charged, say for example the terminal voltage is 3.8 volts, then the regulator starts to dropout when the input side is approx 3.8 + 0.7 = 4.4 volts, at which point the current cannot exceed (8-4.4)/3.3 which is about 1.06 amps. As the battery voltage rises during charging the current tapers slightly and once the voltage reaches the regulator set point it won't rise any further and the circuit is said to be in "float" mode.
 
Last edited:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top