How can I rearrange this for the angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamBevan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Rearrange
iamBevan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
040e7aedfc5c0a9b37f222e28f99fcdf.png


also - The result I'm getting for d is 18587 - this is when I enter 427 for initial velocity, 45 for theta, and 9.81 for g - is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To rearrange, use inverse operations to move things you don't want to the other side -

You're dividing the RHS by g, so multiply both sides by g
You're multiplying the RHS by v^2 so divide both sides by v^2
Then use the inverse sin function
etc.

To see if it's correct, compare the result to some other method for estimating the same thing, or even just your intuition.
 
I get 18586- with decimal part .o345...

To solve for \theta, "unpeel" what has been done:
d= \frac{v^2sin(2\theta)}{g}
so, multiplying both sides by g,
dg= v^2 sin(2\theta)[/itex]<br /> dividing both sides by v^2,<br /> \frac{dg}{v^2}= sin(2\theta)<br /> Taking the inverse sine (arcsin) of both sides<br /> (be careful- since sine is not one-to-one there is no &quot;true&quot; inverse- there are an infinite number of angles with the same sine- two between 0 and pi/2- and &quot;arcsin&quot; only gives one of them)<br /> arcsin\left(\frac{dg}{v^2}\right)= 2\theta<br /> and, finally, divide both sides by 2:<br /> \frac{1}{2}arcsin\left(\frac{dg}{v^2}\right)= \theta
 
Thanks guys - that was a massive help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top