How can I use kinematics to solve this question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PiRsq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
A plane with a mass of 1000 kg lands on a barge weighing 2300 kg at a speed of 50 m/s, and the friction force is one-fourth of the gravitational force acting on the plane. The discussion centers on calculating the minimum length of the barge required to prevent the plane from falling into the sea, considering the plane's deceleration and the barge's acceleration. Participants emphasize using kinematics and the work-energy theorem to determine the distances each body travels as they change speeds. A key point is that the barge accelerates in the direction of the plane's initial velocity, affecting the required length. The discrepancy between calculated and expected lengths highlights the importance of correctly applying kinematic equations and considering the frame of reference.
PiRsq
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
A plane (mass=1000kg) is trying to land on a barge(mass=2300kg). The plane lands with a speed of 50m/s at one end of the barge. The barge is on a calm sea. The force of friction between the plane and the barge is 1/4 the force of gravity acting on the plane. What should be the minimum length of the barge for the plane to not fall into the sea?

What I think:

The only netforce acting on the plane is the force of friction. The plane undergoes a change in momentum which is transferred to the barge(which I do not see how it affects the length of the barge, we are not regarding relativistic effects). I can use the change in momentum and netforce to find the time interval. So since I have the final velocity, initial velocity, time, acceleration, how can I use kinematics to solve this question? Should I use kinematics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you already know the velocity profile, you should be able to calculate the distance the plane goes along the barge. This is the minimum length of the barge, since if the barge were any shorter, the plane would fall off the edge before it stopped.
 


Originally posted by PiRsq
The only netforce acting on the plane is the force of friction. The plane undergoes a change in momentum which is transferred to the barge(which I do not see how it affects the length of the barge, we are not regarding relativistic effects). I can use the change in momentum and netforce to find the time interval. So since I have the final velocity, initial velocity, time, acceleration, how can I use kinematics to solve this question? Should I use kinematics?
Assuming that you can ignore the drag of the water on the boat, you can easily find the final velocity of the boat + plane. The "trick" is then to calculate the distances (measured from a frame at rest in the water) it takes for the plane and barge to reach their final speeds. The plane takes a longer distance than the barge---the barge better be at least as long as that extra distance.

To find the distances, I would use the so-called work-KE theorem, calculating it separately for each body:
F*ΔXcm= ΔKE

This is, of course, equivalent to finding the acceleration of each body and using kinematics:
V2f = V2i + 2aΔX
 
So basically, when the plane slows down on the barge, it accelerates the barge in the direction of its velocity. But if I was on the ship, the distance should be fixed right? So I used the equation Vf^2=Vi^2+2aÄx and got 510 m. But the books answer is 340 meters, what didn't I think of?
 
Originally posted by PiRsq
So basically, when the plane slows down on the barge, it accelerates the barge in the direction of its velocity.
Right. The plane deccelerates; the barge accelerates.
But if I was on the ship, the distance should be fixed right?
If you mean that from the point of view of the ship, the ship doesn't move, then you are correct. But the ship accelerates, so it is not an inertial frame.
So I used the equation Vf^2=Vi^2+2aÄx and got 510 m. But the books answer is 340 meters, what didn't I think of?
Since I have no idea how you applied that equation, I cannot comment. What did you get for the final speed? Did you calculate the two distances like I described earlier?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top