How Can Kinetic Energy and Velocity Be Calculated at the Bottom of a Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cali10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating kinetic energy and velocity at the bottom of a hill using conservation of energy principles. The scenario involves a girl and her bicycle with a combined mass of 59 kg at a height of 22 meters. Participants suggest using the potential energy (PE) formula, PE = mgh, to find the kinetic energy (KE) at the bottom, as PE lost equals KE gained. After calculating PE, the formula KE = 1/2 mv² can be used to determine the velocity. The importance of careful formula application and double-checking calculations is emphasized to avoid errors.
Cali10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(An explanation)
My physics teacher recently passed away, and had been absent due to his illness.
We had last started on acceleration, but the substitute had been working us on Kinetic, Potential energy, and Momentum.

We're having a test, and like myself, none of my classmates are ready, we've discussed this with the substitute, and the other physics teacher, whom I've already tried getting help from, is making us have this test Friday.

I literally have NO idea what I'm doing, I've looked up formulas, but I still don't understand what the heck I'm doing!

If any of you would be so great to help me, or explain how to do it, I would be so thankful!

- Cali

Homework Statement



A girl with a mass of 40 kg on a bicycle with a mass of 19 kg is at the top of a hill that is 22 m high. What is the kinetic energy of the girl and the bicycle as she arrives at the bottom of the hill?


How fast will the girl and the bicycle be going at the bottom of the hill?

Homework Equations



So I know the equation for Kinetic energy is KE = 1/2*M*V2

But I don't understand how to find it if its at the bottom of the hill?

And for the second part, I don't understand how to do it at all.



The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried, but I don't know exactly how to start it off, or anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A girl with a mass of 40 kg on a bicycle with a mass of 19 kg is at the top of a hill that is 22 m high. What is the kinetic energy of the girl and the bicycle as she arrives at the bottom of the hill?
Welcome to PF, Cali.
Start with PE at top = KE at bottom
Fill in the formula for PE, then the numbers and you can calculate the answer.

For the speed at the bottom, use
PE at top = KE at bottom
Put in the formula for KE and the number you got earlier for PE. Solve for v.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Cali! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Cali10 said:
girl with a mass of 40 kg on a bicycle with a mass of 19 kg is at the top of a hill that is 22 m high. What is the kinetic energy of the girl and the bicycle as she arrives at the bottom of the hill?

How fast will the girl and the bicycle be going at the bottom of the hill?

So I know the equation for Kinetic energy is KE = 1/2*M*V2

But I don't understand how to find it if its at the bottom of the hill?

You need to use conservation of energy …

KE + PE = constant, where KE = 1/2 mv2 and PE = mgh (h is height),

ie KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf .

The idea is that the potential energy lost (by reducing height) is converted into increased kinetic energy (by increasing speed).

Try it! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Cali! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


You need to use conservation of energy …

KE + PE = constant, where KE = 1/2 mv2 and PE = mgh (h is height),

ie KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf .

The idea is that the potential energy lost (by reducing height) is converted into increased kinetic energy (by increasing speed).

Try it! :smile:


So once I get the PE, Do I plug that into KE?
And after that I do what?


Delphi51 said:
Welcome to PF, Cali.
Start with PE at top = KE at bottom
Fill in the formula for PE, then the numbers and you can calculate the answer.

For the speed at the bottom, use
PE at top = KE at bottom
Put in the formula for KE and the number you got earlier for PE. Solve for v.

Okay, so for the first part I got 12,720, and when I worked the second part I got 424.
 
Hi Cali! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
Cali10 said:
Okay, so for the first part I got 12,720

Yup! :smile:
… , and when I worked the second part I got 424.

erm :redface: … 424 metres per second on a bike?? :biggrin:

Useful tip: always write out your formula (with m g v etc) first, and then you're less likely to make a mistake! :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top