How Can Maxwell's Equations Estimate Oscillating Fields Near a Light Bulb?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasan_researc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Oscillating
hasan_researc
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Make an order-of-magnitude estimate of the (magnitude of the) oscillating optical-frequency electric and magnetic fields in the vicinity of a light bulb.


Homework Equations



I have no idea as to what equations I should be using!


The Attempt at a Solution



No idea at all! This is a hopelessly difficult task:cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just a suggestion. I'm also really unsure about the question.

For a common incandescent light bulb, the radiation it emits is mostly near/in visible spectrum. This is just my speculation, because if it mostly emits ultraviolet or infrared rays, it harms people and thus wouldn't be used widely. If we know the range of electromagnetic radiation that the light bulb emits the most, we get the answer to the question easily.

Anyway, we should find some way to deduce that the frequency that the light bulb most emits is near the visible range. So now it's your turn:
1. Taking the idea of Wien's displacement law, which gives us the wavelength that a black body emits the most (by solving \frac{\partial u}{\partial \lambda}=0), we can find the frequency of the peak of emission from black bodies, by solving \frac{\partial u}{\partial f}=0. Note that the peak wavelength doesn't correspond to the peak frequency.
2. Assume that the light bulb is a black body. A common light bulb has operating temperature of about 3000K. From here, find the peak frequency of light bulb. This will give you the answer.
 
hikaru1221 said:
This is just a suggestion. I'm also really unsure about the question.

For a common incandescent light bulb, the radiation it emits is mostly near/in visible spectrum. This is just my speculation, because if it mostly emits ultraviolet or infrared rays, it harms people and thus wouldn't be used widely. If we know the range of electromagnetic radiation that the light bulb emits the most, we get the answer to the question easily.
Mostly infrared I'd say. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_bulb#Efficiency_comparisons.
Anyway, we should find some way to deduce that the frequency that the light bulb most emits is near the visible range. So now it's your turn:
1. Taking the idea of Wien's displacement law, which gives us the wavelength that a black body emits the most (by solving \frac{\partial u}{\partial \lambda}=0), we can find the frequency of the peak of emission from black bodies, by solving \frac{\partial u}{\partial f}=0. Note that the peak wavelength doesn't correspond to the peak frequency.
2. Assume that the light bulb is a black body. A common light bulb has operating temperature of about 3000K. From here, find the peak frequency of light bulb. This will give you the answer.

Seems interesting. I'll investigate what is the "u" function.
 
fluidistic said:

Yep. By "infrared", I mean radiation whose wavelength is very far from visible range (visible range is so narrow, so most of the time, things emit mostly radiation out of that range). My rough calculation showed that the peak wavelength is a bit above 750nm, so strictly speaking, it lies in infrared range, but saying in a "tricky way", I'll say it lies near the visible range :biggrin:

I'll investigate what is the "u" function.
Sorry for not clarifying it earlier. It's specific radiative intensity of black bodies (I'm not sure how it's called in English).
And, to the OP, note that the "u" functions in those 2 equations are different.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top