How Can Quantum Mechanics Explain the Eigenstates of a Spherical Pendulum?

LarryC
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have trouble with finding the eigenstates of a spherical pendulum (length $l$, mass $m$) under the small angle approximation. My intuition is that the final result should be some sort of combinations of a harmonic oscillator in $\theta$ and a free particle in $\phi$, but it's not obvious to see this from the Schrodinger equation:
$$
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2ml^2}\bigg[\frac{1}{\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\bigg(\sin\theta\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\theta}\bigg) + \frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial\phi^2} \bigg] + mgl(1-\cos\theta)\psi(\theta,\phi) = E\psi(\theta,\phi)
$$
Using $\sin\theta \approx \theta$ and $\cos\theta\approx 1-\theta^2/2$ leads me to
$$
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2ml^2}\bigg(\frac{\theta}{\Theta}\frac{d\Theta}{d\theta} + \frac{\theta^2}{\Theta}\frac{d^2\Theta}{d\theta^2} + \frac{1}{\Phi}\frac{d^2\Phi}{d\phi^2} \bigg) + \frac{1}{2}mgl\theta^4 = E\theta^2
$$
Here I've already used the ansatz $\psi(\theta,\phi)=\Theta(\theta)\Phi(\phi)$. Of course I can throw away the $\theta^4$ term, but any further simplifications with $\theta^2$ terms would also eliminate the energy, which is what I want. I've also tried to solve the $\Theta(\theta)$ equation with series solutions, and the result seems weird and cannot give my any energy quantizations.

Another attempt is to write the entire kinetic energy term in terms of angular momentum operators, which gives
$$
H=\frac{1}{2ml^2}\bigg(L_\theta^2 + \frac{L_\phi^2}{\sin^2\theta} \bigg) + mgl(1-\cos\theta)
$$
I was hoping to solve this with raising and lowering operators, but that $1/\sin^2\theta$ term is really a pain in the ass. I have no idea of finding a suitable ladder operator that satisfies $[H,\hat{a}] = c\hat{a}$.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LarryC said:
Another attempt is to write the entire kinetic energy term in terms of angular momentum operators, which gives
$$
H=\frac{1}{2ml^2}\bigg(L_\theta^2 + \frac{L_\phi^2}{\sin^2\theta} \bigg) + mgl(1-\cos\theta)
$$
More simply, you have
$$
H=\frac{1}{2ml^2} L^2 + mgl(1-\cos\theta)
$$
The eigenfunctions of ##L^2## are the spherical harmonics, and
$$
Y_1^0(\theta,\phi) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}} \cos \theta
$$
so
$$
mgl(1-\cos\theta) = mgl \left[ 1 - \sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}} Y_0^1 \right]
$$
The coupling between the spherical harmonics due to this term is then the integral of a product of three spherical harmonics, which can be expressed in terms of 3j symbol and easily calculated (check out the books on angular momentum by Zare or by Varshalovich et al.).
 
DrClaude said:
More simply, you have
$$
H=\frac{1}{2ml^2} L^2 + mgl(1-\cos\theta)
$$
The eigenfunctions of ##L^2## are the spherical harmonics, and
$$
Y_1^0(\theta,\phi) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}} \cos \theta
$$
so
$$
mgl(1-\cos\theta) = mgl \left[ 1 - \sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}} Y_0^1 \right]
$$
The coupling between the spherical harmonics due to this term is then the integral of a product of three spherical harmonics, which can be expressed in terms of 3j symbol and easily calculated (check out the books on angular momentum by Zare or by Varshalovich et al.).

Thanks for the great reference! I am just wondering if I can get something related to the harmonic oscillator from out of the approximate form
$$
\bigg[\frac{L^2}{2ml^2}+\frac{1}{2}mgl\theta^2\bigg]\psi = E\psi
$$
This looks like a harmonic oscillator, but ##L## contains both ##\theta## and ##\phi## and I don't know how to commute it with ##\theta##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top