How can the derivative of x^x be solved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
The_Brain
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
How do you solve the derivative of x^x? I'm sure it's fairly easy-- I'm just beginning calc though and none of the "forumlas" work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Take the natural log of both sides.
y=xx
lny=xlnx
Differentiate with respect to x.
(1/y)(dy/dx)=lnx+x/x (chain rule, product rule)
dy/dx=y(lnx+1)

You could do the same thing with y=xa, where a is a constant.
lny=alnx
dy/dx=y(a/x)=xa(a/x)=axa-1
a formula I'm sure you know well
 
Last edited:
or xx = ex*ln(x) ad continue from here...
(ex*ln(x))' = ex*ln(x) * (x*ln(x))' and so on...
 
Originally posted by The_Brain
How do you solve the derivative of x^x? I'm sure it's fairly easy-- I'm just beginning calc though and none of the "forumlas" work.
check out the power rule, learn it , know it, LOVE IT! Its easy, i am just playing but check it out, ok. Any problems with it let me know, k.
Dx :wink:
 


Originally posted by Dx
check out the power rule, learn it , know it, LOVE IT! Its easy, i am just playing but check it out, ok. Any problems with it let me know, k.


No, the power rule is not applicable here because the exponent is not a constant. Stephen Privitera's solution is correct; go with that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top