How can the force of impact on a falling spring mass system be calculated?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force of impact in a spring-mass system when a mass is dropped onto a second spring. Initially, the first spring deforms under the weight of the mass, following the formula x = mg/k. However, when the mass falls with an initial velocity onto a second spring, the interaction changes, as both springs will absorb kinetic energy upon impact. The force exerted on the ground can be determined by analyzing the deflection and energy conservation between the two springs. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify the interaction dynamics between the springs during the impact.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
i have a spring with stiffness k. The spring is resting on the ground. Now a mass is kept over the spring. Now the spring deforms by an amount x=mg/k
where g is the gravity's acceleration.The force acting on the spring is mg Newtons and the reaction force from the ground is also equal to mg Newtons
since this is a statics problem.


Now i take the same spring and the mass over it and drop it over another spring of stiffness k1 fixed to the ground. The spring mass has an initial velocity of v.Now how can i calculate the force exerted on this system by the ground due to the impact.

After calculating this suppose i find that the force of impact is equal to x times mg can is replace the mass by a mass equal to xm and do a static analysis to find deflection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you asking a question?
 
Now i take the same spring and the mass over it and drop it over another spring of stiffness k1 fixed to the ground. The spring mass has an initial velocity of v.Now how can i calculate the force exerted on this system by the ground due to the impact.
You'll have to clarify the interaction between the springs.

When the mass m, falls with the spring, there is no 'weight' pushing down on the spring, since the mass and spring are accelerating with gravity. So while falling the spring k is not deflected, i.e. there is not stored energy.

When the mass, m, and spring of constant k, hit the spring of constant k1, the mass and spring have an initial velocity and kinetic eneryg. Assuming an elastic response, both k and k1 will deflect, each absorbing some of the kinetic energy of m and k (assuming the spring has some mass). Then its a matter conservation of energy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top