How can the limit of a function be determined without using a graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BayernBlues
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
AI Thread Summary
The limit of the function at x=2 does not exist due to the asymptotic behavior observed when evaluating the function near this point. By substituting values close to 2, it is evident that the function approaches positive infinity from the right and negative infinity from the left. This discrepancy confirms that the limit is split and ultimately does not exist. A sign graph can be utilized to illustrate the behavior of the function around critical points, such as roots and asymptotes. The analysis shows that the function diverges as it approaches x=2, validating the conclusion that the limit is undefined.
BayernBlues
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/7875/pset33po8.png

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the answer is limit does not exist but I don't know how to show it mathematically on paper. Is there a way to show this without making a graph?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Plug in 2. You get a nonzero number over 0, which means dividing a common factor won't help. The graph is asymtotic at x=2. You can show which infinity the function goes to with a sign graph. Find all important numbers (roots, asymtotes) and evaluate the function in between each number. The graph will only change signs possibly at a root or asymtote. By plugging in values close to 2 on either side. You should see that the limit is split and does not exist
 
A quick way to check this is to see how does the numerator behave with x -> 2+ and x -> 2-, i.e.

2^3 + 3*2^2 + 4 = 8. Obviously, if x - > 2+, x^3 + 3x^2 + 4 > 8. Now,

x^3 + 3x^2 + 4 > 8

x^3 + 3x^2 + 4 / x - 2 > 8 / x - 2

Since on the right hand side the limit is + infinity, by the inequality we conclude that the limit on left is also + infinity. Now you can proceed with 2-... it may seem a bit long on paper, but it easily done mentally.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top