How can the neutral regions in a diode have constant potential?

AI Thread Summary
The potential in the neutral regions of a PN junction diode is considered constant due to the influence of charges in the depletion region, not the neutral region itself. Although the neutral region contains charges, they are not mobile and do not contribute to the electric field. The assumption of a zero electric field in the neutral region leads to the conclusion of constant potential. The potential variation is primarily determined by the accumulated effects of charges in the doped regions, which are modeled as wide sheets of charge. Understanding this concept requires a fundamental grasp of electric potential calculations from first principles.
Amal Thejus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


It is said that the potential in the neutral regions of a PN junction diode is CONSTANT.

Homework Equations


V=Q/4ΠΣr

The Attempt at a Solution


It is said in all textbooks to ASSUME that the electric field in the neutral regions as zero.
Two aspects confuse me.
1. What charges cause the CONSTANT potential in the neutral region? Is it the charges in the depletion region or the charges in the neutral region(even though net charge is zero there are still charges in the neutral region,which can a cause a potential,right?)
As, for a point in space to have a potential there must be a charge involved since V=Q/4ΠΣr

2. If the potential is due to the charges in the depletion region, how can it be constant through out the neutral region? Since as we move away from the depletion region charges through the neutral region doesn't 'r' in the equation,V=Q/4ΠΣr vary?

Please don't give an answer like since electric field is zero the potential is constant, since i don't think that is a fundamental way to think about it. Please give an answer in terms of the fundamental DEFINITION of Electric Potential. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The charges in the doped regeon ensure this. In the neutral regeon, there are charges, but they are not mobile.
2. You are using the relation incorrectly... the doped regeon is treated as being much wider than it is thick. Thus it is modeled as two very wide sheets of charge.The equation you wrote is for only one charge.

Calculate the potential and electric field due to a large sheet of charge...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesht.html
...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depletion_region
 
  • Like
Likes Amal Thejus
Simon Bridge said:
1. The charges in the doped regeon ensure this. In the neutral regeon, there are charges, but they are not mobile.
2. You are using the relation incorrectly... the doped regeon is treated as being much wider than it is thick. Thus it is modeled as two very wide sheets of charge.The equation you wrote is for only one charge.

Calculate the potential and electric field due to a large sheet of charge...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesht.html
...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depletion_region
So you are saying the CONSTANT potential in the NEUTRAL regions is due to the charges in the NEUTRAL region itself?

If so how does the neutral n region which has more electrons than the neutral p region have a Postive potential compared to the p region ?
I have attached a photo showing the variation of ELECTRIC POTENTIAL inside the diode.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20151025_141135.jpg
    IMG_20151025_141135.jpg
    31 KB · Views: 466
[QuoteSo you are saying the CONSTANT potential in the NEUTRAL regions is due to the charges in the NEUTRAL region itself? [/quote]No.
I am saying it is due to the accumulated effect of all the charges in the charged regeon.
To convince yourself of this you really need to compute the potential yourself, from first principles. This is a common exercize for year 2 college physics students.
You could also read the links provided.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top