How can the range of a projectile fired at an angle up a hill be calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cameo_demon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Projectile
cameo_demon
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
the following problem is from the 5th edition of Thorton and Marion's "Classical Dynamics"
ch.2 problem 14 p.92

Homework Statement
A projectile is fired with initial speed v_0 at an elevation angle of alpha up a hill of slope beta (alpha > beta).

(a) how far up the hill will the projectile land?
(b) at what angle alpha will the range be a maximum?
(c) what is the maximum angle?

The attempt at a solution
apparently this has been a stumper in former classical mechanics classes, but here was as far as i got:

i broke down the components of the forces into x and y
x-component:
a_x=0 integrating -->
v_x = v_0 cos(beta) integrating -->
x = v_0 t cos(beta)

a_y = -g integrating -->
v_y = -gt + v_0 sin (alpha - beta) integrating -->
y = ( -gt^2 / 2 ) + v_0 sin (alpha - beta)


the answer in the back of the book for part (a) is:
d = (2 v_0^2 cos(alpha) sin(alpha-beta) ) / (g cos^2(beta))

any idea how to get from the components to the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: The distance is the magnitude of the position vector.
 
Hootenanny said:
Hint: The distance is the magnitude of the position vector.

I too am having trouble with this problem. In the book, they use Taylor expansions in order to find the flight time T and put in back into the range equation. However, they have the luxury of letting y = 0 because the trajectory is a simple parabola. We don't have the same situation here. y doesn't equal zero, y = beta*range.
 
I have no idea how we're supposed to get things like cos(\beta)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top