How Can the Tension in a Cord Without Mass Be Found?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pharoh123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Tension
AI Thread Summary
To find the tension in the cord when a rubber ball is suspended in a slowing car, the acceleration of the car is calculated to be 2.3 m/s². The equations of motion indicate that tension is dependent on the mass of the ball, which is not provided. Despite this, the book's answer key suggests a tension value of 0.25 N, raising questions about the assumptions made in the problem. The discussion highlights the challenge of solving for tension without knowing the mass, emphasizing the need for all variables to be defined. Ultimately, the conclusion is that tension cannot be accurately determined without the mass of the ball.
pharoh123
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


While in a car, a rubber ball is suspended by a cord. When the car slows down, the ball forms a 13 degree angle. Find the acceleration of the car when it is slowing down and the tension in the cord.
I found the acceleration of the car, which is 2.3 m/s2 easily but when i try to find the tension, i am left with the unknown on the numerator of both sides of the equation and i can`t go further.

Homework Equations


In Y
Ty=mg
T*cos x=mg
m=(T*cosx)/g
-------------------------------------
In x
Tx=max
T*sinx=max
m=(T*sinx)/ax
----------------------------------
m=m
(T*cosx)/g=(T*sinx)/ax
what do i do now?

The Attempt at a Solution


see above
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You won't be able to solve for the tension without knowing the mass of the ball.
 
Doc Al said:
You won't be able to solve for the tension without knowing the mass of the ball.
i thought so too because the question asks you if it is actually possible to find the tension without the mass. I answered no but in the book`s answer key, there`s actually an answer (it`s 0.25N).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top