How can we accurately calculate work using changing acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating work done on an object with changing acceleration, specifically when acceleration is given as 3t^2. The initial claim that no work is done during the first two seconds is incorrect; the net work equals the change in kinetic energy, which is non-zero. To find the work done, one must derive velocity from acceleration by integrating, not differentiating. The participant initially misapplies the formula for work by assuming constant force, but it is clarified that both acceleration and force are changing. Ultimately, the correct approach involves calculating the change in kinetic energy to determine the work done.
ssb
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
My TA gave us a conceptual example today that I don't understand. She was explaining how to derive work if you are given acceleration.

She wrote on the board that an object accelerates with 3t^2. the object weighs 3kg, starts at t=0. She asked us how much work is done on the object durring the first 2 seconds and then she said the answer was zero.

Is this right? what am I not getting:confused: :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is not.
The net work done equals the change in the object's kinetic energy, which certainly is non-zero.
 
arildno said:
No, it is not.
The net work done equals the change in the object's kinetic energy, which certainly is non-zero.

Thanks I knew she was crazy. That makes me feel better.

Do you know how to calculate this in joules by the way so I can go back to her and talk to her about this?
 
You have the acceleration as a function of time. What would you need to do to get the velocity as a function of time?
 
take the derivative right? so it would be 6x right? sorry I am new to this stuff
 
i tried solving for the position function which is just 6. graphicly speaking, a graph of y = 6 from 0 to 2 would cover 12 meters.
since work is force x distance and force is mass x acceleration:

work = (3kg * 3x^2) * (12)
so at time = 2, the work would be 432 joules?

Im sorry but I am thinking i did something wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahhhh cool it is starting to make sence. Thanks!
 
ssb said:
i tried solving for the position function which is just 6. graphicly speaking, a graph of y = 6 from 0 to 2 would cover 12 meters.
since work is force x distance and force is mass x acceleration:

work = (3kg * 3x^2) * (12)
so at time = 2, the work would be 432 joules?

Im sorry but I am thinking i did something wrong.

That would work if your force was constant, but it acceleration is changing and so is force. The best way is to figure out the change in kinetic energy
 
Back
Top