How Can We Accurately Convert MPG to Vehicle Efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating vehicle efficiency from MPG involves understanding the energy dynamics of fuel consumption and power output. At steady speeds, such as 70 mph with a 20 MPG rate, one can determine the power needed to overcome rolling and air resistance, factoring in drivetrain losses. The energy input can be calculated by converting fuel flow rates into calorific values. However, efficiency measurements can vary significantly based on driving conditions, making it challenging to derive a single accurate percentage. Ultimately, while the calculations can provide insights, they represent only specific scenarios rather than a comprehensive efficiency metric.
ISX
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
This seems pretty hard to do but is there a way to figure out how efficient a vehicle is based on fuel used and MPG? I know there's about 1/3 gone to exhaust 1/3 through radiator and 1/3 is work but I want to get an exact percentage on the work part. So it would be 33% if it was like what I just stated. I know weights of the vehicles, everything. I want to factor in as much as possible so I can get the closest possible percent. Thanks for any help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well you need to decide what you want to accomplish by this. The answer varies hugely depending on what the vehicle is doing at the time you choose to take your measurements.

When the vehicle isn't moving, your MPG is obviously zero, and your efficiency (in terms of moving the vehicle) will be zero, but some work is still being done for anciliaries which you may or may not choose to account for.

When the vehicle is moving at full pelt, the equation is pretty easy; just look at the power needed to maintain terminal velocity, the energy going in as fuel, and; well there's your answer.

At part load or part throttle you can do the same consideration under steady state, constant conditions. For transients you're pretty buggered.

What are you trying to do?
 
Yeah that will be good enough. Like at 70mph I get 20mpg so I could base it all off that, just don't know how to do it..
 
Ok.

To work out the power required to propel the car at 70mph you need to calculate the power required to overcome rolling resistance and air resistance. Add a bit for drivetrain efficiencies if you want to take care of those, and ancilliaries. Do all this on a power (ie. watts per second) basis.

To work out the energy going in as fuel, first calculate the fuel flow rate (i.e. what's 20mpg in terms of litres per minute of fuel at 70mph). Then multiply this by the calorific value of the fuel.

Your efficiency is the ratio of the two.
 
also aero drag is major player in MPG..
 
To me this seems like a useless pursuit: any answer you get would only be a single data point, applying only to a specific set of conditions. The thermo eff of a car engine is nearly constant while the mpg varies wildly.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top