How can we calculate the centre of mass using integrals?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass using integrals, specifically focusing on the differences between the expressions \(\int x \, dm\) and \(\int m \, dx\). Participants explore the implications of these formulations in the context of continuous mass distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct formulation for the center of mass, questioning the relationship between mass and position in integrals. There is an exploration of how to interpret the variables in the context of a continuous mass distribution.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the correct use of differential elements in the integral expressions. There is an ongoing examination of the geometric interpretations of the integrals, with no explicit consensus reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions being a beginner in calculus, which may influence their understanding of the concepts discussed. There are also references to specific textbook formulations, indicating a reliance on established definitions and methods.

T7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I appreciate that we can calculate the x-coordinate of the centre of mass of a system of bodies like this:

x = (m_{1}x_{1} + m_{2}x_{2} + m_{3}x_{3} + ... + m_{n}x_{n}) / M

where M is the total mass.

This could be rewritten as

x = \frac {1} {M} \sum_{i=1}^n m_{i}x_{i}

My next step would be to say that

x = \frac {1} {M} \int_{a}^{b} m dx

(I am imagining a scanner sweeping horizontally through an object X and recording its mass at very small intervals).

However, looking in the textbook, it is expressed as

x = \frac {1} {M} \int x dm

I'm a bit of a beginner as far as calculus goes, but it seems to me that\int x dm is not the same as \int m dx.

Looking at the problem geometrically, if you plot m against x, then \int_{a}^{b} m dx will give you an area between the graph of m and the x-axis, whereas \int_{a}^{b} x dm will give you an area between the graph of m and the y-axis.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you imagine a "scanner," as you put it, recording the center of mass (a position!) of each slice, and you add those up, then you get an integral of positions with respect to the mass of the arbitrarily small slice, not the other way around.If you're imagining a bunch of thin slices, and recording the mass at each point, then the mass of each slice is dm, not m (or dx). A solid object can be treated as a continuous distribution of particles, but each is so small that it has the differential mass dm. So, the sums (m_ax_a+m_b+x_b+...+m_nx_n) become x_adm_a+x_bdm_b+...+x_ndm_n, or the integral \int xdm
 
Cheers scholzie.
 
T7 said:
Hi,

I appreciate that we can calculate the x-coordinate of the centre of mass of a system of bodies like this:

x = (m_{1}x_{1} + m_{2}x_{2} + m_{3}x_{3} + ... + m_{n}x_{n}) / M

where M is the total mass.

This could be rewritten as

x = \frac {1} {M} \sum_{i=1}^n m_{i}x_{i}

My next step would be to say that

x = \frac {1} {M} \int_{a}^{b} m dx

(I am imagining a scanner sweeping horizontally through an object X and recording its mass at very small intervals).
But xi is a coordinate- it is not a "small piece" of something. mi is the mass of a small section of solid centered at xi. Perhaps it would be better to write it \Delta m_i. That would make it clearer that you are adding small pieces of mass, each multiplied by the coordinate of its center and so
However, looking in the textbook, it is expressed as

x = \frac {1} {M} \int x dm
is the correct formula.
 
centre of mass

Sketch the region which is bounded by the graps y =x^2+1 of , x = 0, x = 1 and y-0 . Find the coordinates of its centre of mass.

pls help on how to find the centre of mass
 
Ideas, please?
 
Teng, did you sketch the region ?

marlon
 
what is the formula of finding the centre of mass??is it same as finding centroid of a region??
 
yaya.now sketching
 
  • #10
teng125 said:
what is the formula of finding the centre of mass??is it same as finding centroid of a region??
That is correct, unless you have been given a non-constant density function.
 
  • #11
okok...thanx
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K