How can we calculate the required torque to rotate 1200 kg?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rajastc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotate Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the required torque to rotate a mass of 1200 kg attached to a 1.5" diameter shaft, supported by bearings. Participants explore various factors influencing torque, including friction, mass moment of inertia, and the design of a maintenance cart that necessitates rotating the mass 180 degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that any non-zero torque will initiate rotation, with acceleration depending on the torque applied.
  • Another participant suggests that understanding the purpose of the rotation is crucial before calculating torque.
  • A participant mentions the need to design a maintenance cart that supports the 1200 kg assembly and requires rotation for maintenance tasks.
  • Some participants propose that the torque required to rotate a symmetrical setup may be negligible, particularly with no bearing friction considered.
  • Concerns are raised about the mass moment of inertia and the need to account for rotational acceleration and deceleration when calculating torque.
  • Several participants discuss the formula for torque, including components for acceleration, friction, and maintaining motion, while emphasizing the importance of specifying motion parameters for accuracy.
  • There is a mention of using static and kinetic friction coefficients in the calculations for initiating and maintaining rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of friction and symmetry in determining the required torque. While some agree that negligible friction leads to minimal torque requirements, others emphasize the importance of mass moment of inertia and specific motion parameters, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for additional information regarding the mass moment of inertia and the specific conditions of motion to refine torque calculations. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the impact of friction coefficients on the overall torque required.

Rajastc
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
I want to calculate torque to rotate 1200 kg of mass which is attached in 1.5" dia shaft. Shaft is supported by 2 bearings at its end. Neglect bearing frication. Please help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Without friction every non-zero torque will let it start rotating - the acceleration depends on the torque of course.
 
Once you've got it spinning not very much, I think that you need to ask a different question, explain what you're trying to do first.
 
Thanks mfb & Jobrag, Actually i need to design maintenance cart, where i need to support 1200 kg of assembly. Need to rotate 180 degree for first set of maintenance and then rotate again another 180 degree to complete the remaining work.

Planning to use spur gear mechanism and hand wheel to rotate. so i want to calculate torque to rotate 1200 kg.
 
This will be determined by the friction your system has. And by time constraints, assuming you don't want to wait an hour to rotate it.
 
This would be easier with a pint and a sheet of paper. How symmetrical is the piece of equipment, how are you supporting the the bits on the shaft, can you post a photograph of the equipment.
 
Please find the attached concept.
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.jpg
    Picture1.jpg
    20.8 KB · Views: 2,827
If the bit of equipment is as symmetrical as your sketch shows the torque required to rotate it will be negligible.
 
if the mechanism is symmetrical, respective load, torque will be negligible. And consider no bearing friction. Right?

But the formula for torque is
T= mass x g x Radius x coefficient of frication.

I just got confused . please help me.
 
  • #10
In the set up you show the relevant r will be close to zero. Thought experiment with the set up you have will the piece of equipment tend to stay where it is or will the heavy side swing down?
 
  • #11
What is missing in this discussion is the mass moment of inertia of the object to be rotated. Sure, mass = 1200kg. But you also must rotationally accelerate & decelerate that mass, and that requires torque. That is calculated with a rotational mass moment of inertia formula. Either you get the MMI from a CAD model with mass properties or calculate it yourself. Many sources for MMI of primitive shapes (like cylinders, cubes, etc.) that will provide estimates.

For inertia, Torque = MMI x AngularAcceleration.

AngularAcceleration is approximately (ChangeInAngularVelocity) / (ChangeInTime). So you must specify your motion parameters much better in order to gain accuracy.

Finally, turning the object from rest requires PeakTorque = (TorqueToAccelerate) + (TorqueForFriction) + (TorqueToKeepTurning) + (TorqueForAnythingElse) + etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fazrifzi
  • #12
Rajastc said:
if the mechanism is symmetrical, respective load, torque will be negligible. And consider no bearing friction. Right?

But the formula for torque is
T= mass x g x Radius x coefficient of frication.
That's what I said earlier: if friction is negligile, even very small torque values will be sufficient.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fazrifzi
  • #13
Thanks tygerdawg , mfb & Jobrag..I got fair idea to proceed further.

tygerdawg said:
Finally, turning the object from rest requires PeakTorque = (TorqueToAccelerate) + (TorqueForFriction) + (TorqueToKeepTurning) + (TorqueForAnythingElse) + etc.
The formula for torque:
1. Torque to accelerate= MMI x Acceleration.
2. Torque for frication= T=μ*m*g*R
where :
T : the required torque
μ : the friction coefficient
m : the weight of the cylinder
g : Earth gravity
R : radius at contact bearings/cylinder
Can you confirm the above torque for frication formula?

3. Torque to keep turning :
In my case , no need continuous rotation. but for understanding, can you give some more information?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fazrifzi
  • #14
Looks good.
Torque to keep it moving is just friction, but with the coefficient of kinetic friction instead of static friction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fazrifzi
  • #15
Rajastc said:
Thanks tygerdawg , mfb & Jobrag..I got fair idea to proceed further.The formula for torque:
1. Torque to accelerate= MMI x Acceleration.
2. Torque for frication= T=μ*m*g*R
where :
T : the required torque
μ : the friction coefficient
m : the weight of the cylinder
g : Earth gravity
R : radius at contact bearings/cylinder
Can you confirm the above torque for frication formula?

3. Torque to keep turning :
In my case , no need continuous rotation. but for understanding, can you give some more information?
To initiate rotation we will need to consider co-efficient of static friction and "torque required to keep it turning" will require to consider co-efficient of kinetic friction. so
Torque required to keep turning = Torque to accelerate= MMI x Acceleration + Torque for frication= T=μkinetic*m*g*R
 
  • #16
Hi All, Thank for the great help. I got good understanding to proceed further.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K