How Can You Solve Limit Problems Without Graphing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hayesk85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calc 1 Limit
hayesk85
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
limit problem - calc 1 please see reply

Homework Statement



limx->0 1/x



The Attempt at a Solution



I know this is easy if you graph it on the calculator, but I want to know the logic behind the getting the answer without graphing it.

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, plug in values less than 1 and more than -1 and you'll see that you get closer and closer to positive or negative infinity. For example 1/.1 = 10, 1/-.1 = -10, 1/.01 = 100, 1/-.01 = -100.

Now if you know enough about limits, then you'll realize that:

\lim_{x\rightarrow0} \frac{1}{x}

does not exist because:

\lim_{x\rightarrow0^+} \frac{1}{x} does not equal \lim_{x\rightarrow0^-} \frac{1}{x}
 
Sorry, I meant:

limx->0 sin(1/x)

Now its harder!
 
Well technically, you can look at it almost the same way as I described above. There is one other thing to notice though. Remember as x gets closer and closer to zero, then 1/x gets infinitely larger. Now what if 1/x was equal to \pi/2 then the sin would be 1. Now what if x got closer to zero and 1/x was equal to 3\pi/2, then the sin would -1. So, this means as you keep getting closer and closer to zero (from both sides), each side oscillates an infinite amount of times (alternating oscillations on each side of the y-axis of course because of negative and positive x's resulting in negative and positive sin's).

I hope that clears your reasoning up a little bit. At least that is how I like to look at it, but that's my first time ever explaining it to someone, so I'm sorry if it sounds a bit confusing.
 
Expanding on what chislam has said, you may or may not be aware of the theorom stating that using any sequence of x that tends to 0, (xn), then if the limit exists f((xn)) must converge to this limit for all subsequences. I will leave it to you to find the required subsequences to prove the limit doesn't exist.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top