How Can You Solve Vector Field Line Integrals Without Gaussian Integrals?

destroyer130
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
This problem is about Line integral of Vector Field. I believe the equation i need to use is:

\intF.dr = \intF.r'dt, with r = r(t)

I try to solve it like this:
C1: r1= < 1 - t , 3t , 0 >
C2: r2= < 0 , 3 - 3t , t >
C3: r3= < t , 0 , 1 - t >

After some computation, I got stuck at the part that have 2 Gaussian Integrals!

\int(t from 0 -> 1) [-3t + 3t^2 + e^(t^2) - e^[(t-1)^2]]dt

I see the answer is 1/2. I check my integrals and observe somehow these 2 Gaussian either cancel out or both equals 0, but I just have no clue how to show it. Another idea I could think of is that there is other way to solve this problem without involving doing those integrals.

Thanks for checking out my problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
destroyer130 said:
This problem is about Line integral of Vector Field. I believe the equation i need to use is:

\intF.dr = \intF.r'dt, with r = r(t)

I try to solve it like this:
C1: r1= < 1 - t , 3t , 0 >
C2: r2= < 0 , 3 - 3t , t >
C3: r3= < t , 0 , 1 - t >

After some computation, I got stuck at the part that have 2 Gaussian Integrals!

\int(t from 0 -> 1) [-3t + 3t^2 + e^(t^2) - e^[(t-1)^2]]dt

I see the answer is 1/2. I check my integrals and observe somehow these 2 Gaussian either cancel out or both equals 0, but I just have no clue how to show it. Another idea I could think of is that there is other way to solve this problem without involving doing those integrals.

Thanks for checking out my problem.

Yes, you can show they cancel. Take the integral of e^[(1-t)^2] and apply the substitution u=1-t.
 
Dick said:
Yes, you can show they cancel. Take the integral of e^[(1-t)^2] and apply the substitution u=1-t.

Wow i didn't know that there's such technique. This is from my sample final exam about Vector Integral. Could you look at the problem i attached and tell me if there's any other way that didn't have to go through that Gaussian Integrals? Thanks a lot Dick!

problem.jpg
 
destroyer130 said:
Wow i didn't know that there's such technique. This is from my sample final exam about Vector Integral. Could you look at the problem i attached and tell me if there's any other way that didn't have to go through that Gaussian Integrals? Thanks a lot Dick!

View attachment 53941

It's a trick you can use to show some definite integrals are related. It's not much of a general technique. Why not apply Stoke's theorem?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top