How Close Does the Alpha Particle Get to the Platinum Nucleus?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating how close an alpha particle can get to a platinum nucleus during a Rutherford-type scattering experiment. The alpha particle has a kinetic energy of 4.0 MeV, and the user attempts to apply energy conservation principles to derive a formula for the distance from the nucleus. There is a clarification that K in the formula refers to Coulomb's constant (9 x 10^9) rather than Planck's constant, which is denoted by h. The user is reassured that they are on the right track, with guidance on correctly identifying the charges involved in the calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the constants and their correct application in the context of the problem.
BubbaJonze
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An Alpha particle of a Rutherford-type scattering experiment is shot directly toward a platinum nucleus. One of the particles was apparently aimed directly at the centre of the nucleus cause it shot 180 degrees back along the same path. How close does it come to the platinum nucleus?

Homework Equations



Kinetic energy of Alpha particle: 4.0 MeV

The Attempt at a Solution


Doubt this is right, but I figured energy conservation had something to do with it.
\sumE_{}initial=\sumE_{}final

After some re-arranging, this is what I came up with:
\frac{Kq_{1}q_{2}}{r}=E

So I figured I was solving for r, in which case i got this formula \frac{Kq_{1}q_{2}}{E}
K= Planck's constant
q= elementary charge
E= 4.0MeV (?)

Can someone tell me if I'm anywhere near the right track? We didn't really learn about it, but my instructor stated it was a "challenger" question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track.

K is not Planck's constant though. K =9X10^9.

Planck's constant, on the other hand, is usually denoted by h and is 6.626X10^-34

Just remember that while q_1=electronic charge, q_2 will be the charge of the other body in the problem, the platinum nucleus.
 
G01 said:
You are on the right track.

K is not Planck's constant though. K =9X10^9.

Planck's constant, on the other hand, is usually denoted by h and is 6.626X10^-34

Just remember that while q_1=electronic charge, q_2 will be the charge of the other body in the problem, the platinum nucleus.
Oh, that's right. I guess I got a little confused since Coulomb's Law was in my last unit and now my constants are all messed up. Thanks.
 
Anytime.:smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top