How come electric potentials have different signs?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of electric potential due to a point charge and the confusion arising from the integration limits when calculating potential. The original poster notes a discrepancy in signs when integrating from infinity to a point R versus from R to infinity, questioning the implications of these different approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why the sign of the electric potential changes when integrating from different limits. They express confusion about the integration process and its relation to electric potential and potential energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the importance of considering the direction of the electric field and the differential elements during integration. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical reasoning behind the integration process, with participants suggesting a need for clarity in the original poster's calculations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has referenced a textbook and provided an image of their work, which some participants find difficult to read. There is a suggestion for clearer presentation of the mathematical work to facilitate better assistance.

ben123467
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The textbook says to find the electric potential due to a point charge by moving a test charge from R to infinity, and integrating using the equation below. But when I integrate from infinity to R, the sign switches. Why is that? Both times, electric potential at V is 0.

This is confusing because to find the electric potential from point charge, you integrate from R to infinity, but to find the potential energy of a system, you integrate from infinity to R

Homework Equations


Rinf E dot ds = Vf - Vi

The Attempt at a Solution


From R to inf
Vi = K q/r

From inf to R
Vf = -K q/r
OwEc2Ur.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/OwEc2Ur.jpg in case not clear
 

Attachments

  • OwEc2Ur.jpg
    OwEc2Ur.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 460
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ben123467,

:welcome:

You need to be a bit careful when you integrate an expression that comes from vectors. The electric field has a direction, and so do the ds elements. The ds elements have a direction that depends upon your limits of integration. When you exchange the limits, the direction of the ds elements change. In the scalar version of the integration, that's handled by the ##cos(\theta)## in the dot product.
 
gneill said:
Hi ben123467,

:welcome:

You need to be a bit careful when you integrate an expression that comes from vectors. The electric field has a direction, and so do the ds elements. The ds elements have a direction that depends upon your limits of integration. When you exchange the limits, the direction of the ds elements change. In the scalar version of the integration, that's handled by the ##cos(\theta)## in the dot product.

I took into account the opposite directions of E and ds though. I uploaded a picture, can you check my math?
 
Kind of difficult to read your image due to the scale. A closeup of the textbook page posted separately might help, and either the same for your handwritten work or, much preferred, type out your work so that helpers can easily quote individual lines in their replies. The ##\Sigma## icon in the edit window header bar gives you access to math symbols, and you can also use LaTeX syntax to render math expressions in a very nice way.
 
gneill said:
Kind of difficult to read your image due to the scale. A closeup of the textbook page posted separately might help, and either the same for your handwritten work or, much preferred, type out your work so that helpers can easily quote individual lines in their replies. The ##\Sigma## icon in the edit window header bar gives you access to math symbols, and you can also use LaTeX syntax to render math expressions in a very nice way.

There's a link to imgur below the image if that helps. You can zoom in from there.
 
ben123467 said:
There's a link to imgur below the image if that helps. You can zoom in from there.
Still no joy. The zoom is the same as what's available for your in-post image.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
981
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
741
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K