A How Did Scientists Calculate the Orbital Radius of Jupiter's Moons?

AI Thread Summary
Scientists calculated the orbital radius of Jupiter's moons by measuring the angular distance from Jupiter to the moons using telescopes. The formula D = θ d / 206,265 allows for the calculation of linear size based on angular size and distance. Observations during opposition, when the moon is farthest from Jupiter, can enhance accuracy, but multiple measurements over orbits provide better estimates. Historical methods, such as Römer's 17th-century work on the speed of light, contributed to understanding the distance to Jupiter, although his initial calculations had significant errors. Overall, precise measurements and historical advancements have shaped our knowledge of Jovian moon orbits.
Forcino
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How did the first scientists figure out the orbital radius of a moon of Jupiter? How can observations lead to a calculation of the orbital radius of a moon of another planet?
How did the first scientists figure out the orbital radius of a moon of Jupiter? How can observations lead to a calculation of the orbital radius of a moon of another planet?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thank you.

So would you find the orbital radius of a Jovian moon by using a telescope to view Jupiter at opposition during a time when the moon is farthest from Jupiter? Then you could find the arcseconds of angle from the center of Jupiter to the center of the moon? Then you could use the equation D = θ d / 206,265? Then D would be the orbital radius of the moon?
 
Yeah, although:
1. it doesn't really have to be at opposition
2. you'd need to measure the angular distance of the moon over several/many orbits to get a good estimate of the maximum orbital radius.
 
How did the scientists figure out distance to Jupiter back in 17th century? Römer measured speed of light by 1676, but he got the speed about 30% too slow. How much of it was the error in travel time, how much the error in distance to Jupiter?
How much was Römer´s distance in 1676 better than Galilei´s distance, if any, in 1610?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top