How Do B and Gamma Values Affect Polarization in Electromagnetic Waves?

Rubiss
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm currently trying to understand linear and circular polarization of electromagnetic plane waves. Let's say I have an electric field given by

\vec{E}=Acos(kx-\omega t)\hat{x}+Bcos(kx-\omega t - \gamma)\hat{y}

A is given and nonzero. I want to find what values of B and gamma that can make the wave linear or circularly polarized.

Homework Equations



I can also write the electric field as

\vec{E}=Re \big((A\hat{x}+Be^{-i\gamma}\hat{y})e^{i(kx-\omega t)}\big)


The Attempt at a Solution



For the linear polarization, I'm thinking I can either make B=0, or gamma equal to n*pi if B is not equal to zero. Can anyone comment on my thinking?

For circular polarization, I'm thinking I need to have A=B and gamma equal to n*pi/2 for odd n. I will have right handed circular polarization if n=3,7,11,... and have left handed circular polarization if n=1,5,9,... Is this thinking correct?

Is there an easier way to do this that I am not seeing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it's not cos(kz - wt) etc.? Because if not this is not a possible e-m wave.
 
Assuming propagation in the z direction, you can solve this by writing the E field at z = 0, writing the x and y components of E and eliminating t between them. The result is y(x,phi,A,B) which then makes it obvious the restrictions on B and phi you must impose to effect linear or circular polarization. You could even go further and do the same for elliptical polarization for extra credit ...
 
Rubiss said:

Homework Statement



I'm currently trying to understand linear and circular polarization of electromagnetic plane waves. Let's say I have an electric field given by

\vec{E}=Acos(kx-\omega t)\hat{x}+Bcos(kx-\omega t - \gamma)\hat{y}

A is given and nonzero. I want to find what values of B and gamma that can make the wave linear or circularly polarized.

Homework Equations



I can also write the electric field as

\vec{E}=Re \big((A\hat{x}+Be^{-i\gamma}\hat{y})e^{i(kx-\omega t)}\big)

OK. I never did respond to you directly. Here goes:

The Attempt at a Solution



For the linear polarization, I'm thinking I can either make B=0, or gamma equal to n*pi if B is not equal to zero. Can anyone comment on my thinking?

Right.
For circular polarization, I'm thinking I need to have A=B and gamma equal to n*pi/2 for odd n. I will have right handed circular polarization if n=3,7,11,... and have left handed circular polarization if n=1,5,9,... Is this thinking correct?

Almost right. B can be + or -A. The choice of sign determines right or left circular polarization. That makes it tantamount to choosing n for γ the way you did.
Is there an easier way to do this that I am not seeing?

Hard to say since you didn't tell us how you got your results in the first place ...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top