How Do Commutators of Functions of Observables Work in Quantum Mechanics?

WisheDeom
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Quantum Theory: Commutators of Functions of Observables

Homework Statement



First is a question from Sakurai Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., 1.29a.

Show that

[x_i,G(\mathbf{p})] = i\hbar\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}

and

[p_i,F(\mathbf{x})] = - i\hbar\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i}

for any functions F(\mathbf{x}) and G(\mathbf{p}) which can be expanded in power series of their arguments.



Homework Equations



Definition of a Taylor series of a function f of variable x expanded around point a:

f(x) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}(x-a)

Commutator of position and momentum operators: [x_i,p_j]=i\hbar\delta_{ij}.



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried a general solution, i.e. looking at the commutator [F(\mathbf{x}), G(\mathbf{p})]. The first problem I'm having is with the concept of taking derivatives with respect to operators. Can I simply treat x as a scalar while computing \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}, for example? Is

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2) = 2x

valid?

Assuming I have that right, I am really stuck on the Taylor expansion itself. I don't see why powers of higher than first order would disappear. I assume my solution will look something like


[F(\mathbf{x}),G(\mathbf{p})] = [\mathbf{x},\mathbf{p}]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}

which would satisfy the problem, but I don't know how to get there.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


WisheDeom said:
I tried a general solution, i.e. looking at the commutator [F(\mathbf{x}), G(\mathbf{p})]. The first problem I'm having is with the concept of taking derivatives with respect to operators. Can I simply treat x as a scalar while computing \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}, for example? Is

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2) = 2x

valid?

Assuming I have that right, I am really stuck on the Taylor expansion itself. I don't see why powers of higher than first order would disappear. I assume my solution will look something like[F(\mathbf{x}),G(\mathbf{p})] = [\mathbf{x},\mathbf{p}]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}

which would satisfy the problem, but I don't know how to get there.

Thank you!

Here, \mathbf{x} and \mathbf{p} are vector operators, so if you use a Taylor expansion, you will need to use the multivariable form, given in equation (31) here.

Luckily, you can avoid that entirely, all you need for this problem is the general form of the series expansion of G(\mathbf{p}) (and your commutation relation of course). In 3 dimensions, the series expansion has the general form G(\mathbf{p}) = \sum_{n_1=0}^\infty \sum_{n_2=0}^\infty \sum_{n_3=0}^\infty g(n_1, n_2, n_3 ) (p_1)^{n_1}(p_2)^{n_2}(p_3)^{n_3}. That is, you expect a series that in general has has a term for each possible combination of (positive integer) powers of each p_j.

What is [x_j, G(\mathbf{p})] according to this general expansion? What is \frac{\partial G}{\partial p_i}?
 
Last edited:
Ah! Thank you, that was straightforward.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top