- 329

- 0

## Main Question or Discussion Point

Do electrons flowing in a circuit perform work with their mass (or kinetic energy)? For example like a water flowing in a creek through a turbine. If so does E = 1/2 mv^2 apply.

- Thread starter nuby
- Start date

- 329

- 0

Do electrons flowing in a circuit perform work with their mass (or kinetic energy)? For example like a water flowing in a creek through a turbine. If so does E = 1/2 mv^2 apply.

- 2,945

- 0

The kinetic energy of a non-relativistic electro, such as those in an electric circuit, is K = mv^2/2. A deeper analysis requires quantum mechanics where the concept of force, and thus work, is meaningless.Do electrons flowing in a circuit perform work with their mass (or kinetic energy)? For example like a water flowing in a creek through a turbine. If so does E = 1/2 mv^2 apply.

Pete

- 329

- 0

What does the "/2" represent in that equasion (in reality)? K = mv^2/2

Thanks for your response.

Thanks for your response.

Last edited:

- 2,945

- 0

Division. E.g. the expression x/2 means that x is divided by two.What does the "/2" represent in that equasion (in reality)? K = mv^2/2

Thanks for your response.

And you're very welcome. Glad to be of service.

Best wishes

Pete

- 329

- 0

i knew it was divided by 2 :P .. but I was wondering more why it is divided by two. :)

- 458

- 0

[tex]KE=\int_0^Vmv dv = m\int_0^V v dv = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \ |_0^V =\frac{1}{2}mV^2[/tex]

- 329

- 0

I'm guessing the /2 means it is only 1/2 the force used to put an object in motion. Is that correct?

chroot

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 10,165

- 34

- Warren

Dale

Mentor

- 28,525

- 4,846

- 329

- 0

Dale

Mentor

- 28,525

- 4,846

I would think their electric field is much more relevant than their mass.

Your reference earlier to water in a turbine is close. I would actually relate it to water in an enclosed pipe. Hydraulic energy is pressure times volume. The analogy would be of "electricity" being like an incompressible fluid where the energy is voltage times charge. The mass doesn't really factor in explicitly for either case.

Your reference earlier to water in a turbine is close. I would actually relate it to water in an enclosed pipe. Hydraulic energy is pressure times volume. The analogy would be of "electricity" being like an incompressible fluid where the energy is voltage times charge. The mass doesn't really factor in explicitly for either case.

Last edited:

- 329

- 0

An electric field in my opinion is just a force that makes electrons move (measured in volts), and not necessarily the main 'work' force in a circuit.

If you have two magets sitting on a table (N/S), with say a unipolar magnet between them (o), and a non-magnetic barrier (I).

like this:

..N<.....I.....o......<S..

From a simple point of view, the mass of the 'o' will be the main factor of the work actually done to push over (I). I believe this is the same concept occuring in most electronic circuits, and the electron push/pull force then would be the energy 'transmitters' and the mass of the electron, which changes due to electrical resistance (giving off heat/light) is doing the actual 'work'.

If this is true, then voltage is actually a measurement of the potential speed of the electrons in a circuit.

If you have two magets sitting on a table (N/S), with say a unipolar magnet between them (o), and a non-magnetic barrier (I).

like this:

..N<.....I.....o......<S..

From a simple point of view, the mass of the 'o' will be the main factor of the work actually done to push over (I). I believe this is the same concept occuring in most electronic circuits, and the electron push/pull force then would be the energy 'transmitters' and the mass of the electron, which changes due to electrical resistance (giving off heat/light) is doing the actual 'work'.

If this is true, then voltage is actually a measurement of the potential speed of the electrons in a circuit.

Last edited:

Dale

Mentor

- 28,525

- 4,846

First, there is no such thing as a unipolar magnet.If you have two magets sitting on a table (N/S), with say a unipolar magnet between them (o), and a non-magnetic barrier (I).

like this:

..N<.....I.....o......<S..

From a simple point of view, the mass of the 'o' will be the main factor of the work actually done. I believe this is the same concept that is occuring in most electronic circuits.

Second, the mass of 'o' is irrelevant to the work done in this example. Remember, work is the (scalar) product of force and distance, mass does not enter in. If 'o' experiences 1N of force and travels a distance of 1m then the work done on 'o' will be 1J regardless of the mass of 'o'.

- 329

- 0

DaleSpam,

So if you throw an object in space, and it travels 1M at 1N force, is the work still 1J regardless of the mass?

Dale

Mentor

- 28,525

- 4,846

Correct. An object with 1kg mass will end with a velocity of 1.41 m/s and an object with 2kg mass will end with a velocity of 1 m/s, but the work is 1J in each case and the KE is also 1J in each case.So if you throw an object in space, and it travels 1M at 1N force, is the work still 1J regardless of the mass?

- 329

- 0

DaleSpam,Correct. An object with 1kg mass will end with a velocity of 1.41 m/s and an object with 2kg mass will end with a velocity of 1 m/s, but the work is 1J in each case and the KE is also 1J in each case.

Can you give me the simple equation for that, as well as the equation for energy required to slow down that same object?

Thanks

- 516

- 0

Sorry to interrupt you here, but reading your initial question I wonder something has been misunderstood. You said:

They'd have to slow down to perform work out of their kinetic energy. But they don't slow down to a halt, as they move from atom to atom. Instead they gain some kinetic energy under the influence of the field, they lose some (turned into heat), they gain some, they lose some, and so on. Gaining and losing overlap. But they don't stop, so any expression like 1/2 mv^2 is irrelevant to the work actually done to turn their potential energy into heat and warm up the conductor.Do electrons flowing in a circuit perform work with their mass (or kinetic energy)?

Last edited:

Dale

Mentor

- 28,525

- 4,846

W = f.dCan you give me the simple equation for that, as well as the equation for energy required to slow down that same object?

KE = 1/2 m v^2

dW = dKE

- 329

- 0

Can KE = 1/2mv^2 and F=ma or be applied to electrons.

- 458

- 0

In some circumstances, it can. (cathode ray tube questions and sorts).

Dale

Mentor

- 28,525

- 4,846

Yes. However, remember that in most circuits (other than cathode rays etc. as mentioned), the electrons never move with any significant velocity, never attain any appreciable amount of KE, and give up any energy imparted to them almost as soon as they get it.Can KE = 1/2mv^2 and F=ma or be applied to electrons.

- 329

- 0

I've heard electrons travel very slowly in standard circuits before (cms per hour), however, I've never seen any proof of this. How was this measurement taken?

Is it possible that conduction band ("free") electrons move rapidly through a conductor in a spiral path, but only 'outputs' as much current is being drawn... This could give the appearance of slow moving electrons.

Is it possible that conduction band ("free") electrons move rapidly through a conductor in a spiral path, but only 'outputs' as much current is being drawn... This could give the appearance of slow moving electrons.

Last edited:

- 188

- 1

Yes, individual electrons (or rather, I mean the drift velocity) actually move very slowly. See this:I've heard electrons travel very slowly in standard circuits before (cms per hour), however, I've never seen any proof of this. How was this measurement taken?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ohmmic.html

- 458

- 0

[tex]I=\frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta t}[/tex]

Where:

[tex]\Delta Q=nA\Delta x q[/tex]

Where n is the density of charge carriers (a very large number) and is a property of the material you are running a current through, ie. a constant. Therefore:

[tex]I=\frac{nA\Delta x q}{\Delta t}={nAv_dq[/tex]

Where v_d is the drift velocity.

- 329

- 0

Is it possible that conduction band electrons, and valance, etc. move a difference speeds?

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 48

- Views
- 7K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 584

- Replies
- 269

- Views
- 33K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 15K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 4K