How do even cell contributions determine insulator behavior in band theory?

secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have a question about insulator.

The story starts from the fact that, taking a 1-D model, there are N possible values of wave vectors k within the first Brillouin zone [becasue number of possible k's = (2*Pi/a)/(2*Pi/L) = L/a = N where L is the length of the crystal, a is the distance between two adjacent cells]. Also, we know that each k state could have up or down spin. Hence there are in total 2N levels in each band, which is always an even number. This far is fine.

However, how can we proceed from this point to argue that "each cell contributing an even number of electrons" is a necessary condition for a material to be an insulator? To be specific, the confusion is this: It seems to me that EVERY cell in the crystal contribute when talking about band-filling. Hence isn't it true that if we have an even number of cells, we can fill all 2N states despite each cell contributing an odd number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order for a material to be an insulator, it is necessary for each cell to contribute an even number of electrons. This is because if each cell contributes an odd number of electrons, then the total number of electrons in the Brillouin zone will be an odd number, and this will lead to some of the states in the band being unoccupied. This means that there will be electrons which can move freely from one state to another, leading to conductivity. Thus, it is necessary for each cell to contribute an even number of electrons in order for the material to be an insulator.
 


Thank you for your question. The role of even cell contributions in insulators is a fundamental concept in band theory that helps explain the behavior of insulators. To understand this concept, we need to first understand the concept of band filling and how it relates to the number of cells in a crystal.

In a material, electrons occupy energy levels or bands, and the number of electrons that can occupy these bands is determined by the number of available states in each band. In a 1-D model, as you mentioned, there are N possible values of wave vectors k within the first Brillouin zone. Each of these k states can accommodate two electrons, one with spin up and one with spin down, resulting in a total of 2N levels in each band.

Now, when we talk about band filling, we are referring to the number of electrons that occupy these energy levels. In an insulator, the valence band (the highest energy band that is fully occupied at 0K) is completely filled, and the conduction band (the next higher energy band) is completely empty. This means that there are no available energy states for electrons to move into and conduct electricity. This is what makes insulators poor conductors of electricity.

So, why is it important for each cell to contribute an even number of electrons? This is because in an insulator, the valence band is completely filled, and the conduction band is completely empty. This can only happen if each cell contributes an even number of electrons. If a cell were to contribute an odd number of electrons, it would result in an incomplete filling of the valence band or an incomplete emptying of the conduction band, making the material a conductor instead of an insulator.

To answer your specific confusion, it is true that every cell in the crystal contributes to band filling. However, the key point is that each cell must contribute an even number of electrons for the material to be an insulator. In other words, the total number of electrons in the valence band and the conduction band must be even for the material to have an energy gap and exhibit insulating behavior.

In summary, the concept of even cell contributions in insulators is a necessary condition because it ensures that the valence band is completely filled and the conduction band is completely empty, resulting in an energy gap and insulating behavior. I hope this clarifies your confusion.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top