How do gradient and velocity relate on an inclined plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter seamonkeydoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Velocity
seamonkeydoo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Gradient and velocity

Just curious

Let's say I have a plane with the equation

4x + 5y + 6z = 45

If I find \nablaF(x,y,z) and then find it's magnitude, I get the direction of steepest descent/ascent in the direction of <\partialF(x,y,z)/\partialx,\partialF(x,y,z)/\partialy, \partialF(x,y,z)/\partialz> and the magnitude of the vector in that direction right?

How would I find the velocity vector of a particle from the top of the plane to the bottom in the direction of the gradient vector? Would I just think of it as an inclined plane? And how is velocity related to finding the gradient?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi seamonkeydoo! Welcome to PF! :smile:
seamonkeydoo said:
How would I find the velocity vector of a particle from the top of the plane to the bottom in the direction of the gradient vector? Would I just think of it as an inclined plane?

uhh? It is an inclined plane! :confused:

Yes, the gradient vector "downhill" is the same as an actual vector "downhill".

Generally, the gradient vector of a curved surface is the same as the actual "downhill" vector of the tangent plane. :wink:
And how is velocity related to finding the gradient?

It'll be proportional to the gradient.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top