Schools How do graduate schools judge part time graduate applications

AI Thread Summary
Part-time graduate students often finance their own education without significant university assistance, leading to questions about admission criteria. Some argue that universities may be less stringent in admitting part-time students, viewing their applications as a source of revenue. However, this perspective overlooks the complexities of graduate research. Professors prioritize strong candidates to advance their projects, and part-time students may slow down research progress due to their limited availability. Additionally, the financial incentives for departments to admit part-time students are generally minimal, as they do not profit significantly from graduate course tuition. The discussion also highlights ambiguities regarding the specific fields of study and degree levels, noting that part-time options may vary greatly between disciplines, particularly in rigorous areas like physics where full-time commitment is often essential.
trickslapper
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Basically part-time graduate students are paying their own way through grad school. At the least they probably aren't receiving much if any assistance from the university. Because of this, are university departments less strict on the criteria for admitting a part-time student?

If i put myself in the shoes of a university official a part-time graduate student application is free money. I hate to put it like that but, it is what it is. So doesn't it make sense that it would be easier to be admitted as a part-time student vs a full-time student?

Just something that popped into my head the other day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no such thing as free money.

Professors are genuinely interested in advancing their research. Admitting a graduate student part-time means that whatever project that student will become a part of will take about twice as long to finish (perhaps more so since people tend not to be as productive with more interruptions) and full time graduate students already take long enough to get up to speed and become productive.

Also with respect to advancing research, they generally want the strongest candidates they can recruit to work on their projects.

I'm sure there may be schools out there that look at graduate students as some kind of cash grab, but you might want to ask yourself - is that really where you want to go for your graduate studies?
 
To add to what Choppy said, the Department admits students for graduate work, and while the way the accounting is done varies by university, typically the Department does not receive any net income from teaching graduate courses. So the financial incentive you describe is small or nonexistent.
 
trickslapper said:
Basically part-time graduate students are paying their own way through grad school. At the least they probably aren't receiving much if any assistance from the university. Because of this, are university departments less strict on the criteria for admitting a part-time student?

If i put myself in the shoes of a university official a part-time graduate student application is free money. I hate to put it like that but, it is what it is. So doesn't it make sense that it would be easier to be admitted as a part-time student vs a full-time student?

Just something that popped into my head the other day.

There are several ambiguities here:

1. Is this in physics? Nowhere in here did you mention the subject area. Part time MBA is not the same as part time in physics.

2. What degree level is this for? I have seen part time physics M.Sc students enrolling in such a degree that had the option of no research, but rather, passing a qualifying exam-type. For a Ph.D in physics, I have never come across anyone doing it part time. The commitment required is just too much to do it that way. Think about it. If you are doing experimental high energy physics, and your research requires that you spend 2 months at a time doing your shift at the LHC, you can't do this "part time". The same with many other areas of physics where long stretches of data-taking are common.

Zz.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top