How Do I Analyze and Graph the Function \( \frac{x}{x^2-4} \)?

AI Thread Summary
The function \( \frac{x}{x^2-4} \) has a domain of (-∞, -2) ∪ (-2, 2) ∪ (2, ∞) and features vertical asymptotes at x = -2 and x = 2. The first derivative indicates the function is decreasing everywhere, with no local maxima or minima. The second derivative is zero at x = 0, suggesting a point of inflection and areas of concavity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of analyzing the function's behavior around asymptotes and using derivatives to determine intervals of increase, decrease, and concavity. Graphing should be done based on this analysis rather than relying on calculators.
jzq
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Sketch the graph of the function, using the curve-sketching guide.

Function: \frac {x}{x^2-4}

So far I have derived this information from the function: (Please check!)

Domain: (-\infty,-2)\cup(-2,2)\cup(2,\infty)
y-int: (0,0)
x-int: (0,0)
Asymptote: x=-2 , x=2
First Derivative: f'(x)=\frac {-x^2-4}{(x^2-4)^2}
Second Derivative: f''(x)=\frac {2x(x^2+12)}{(x^2-4)^3}

The information that I need now is where it is increasing and decreasing; the relative minimum; where it concaves up and down; and the points of inflection. My problem is, when I plug in zero for y in the derivatives, it gets complicated. For example, the first derivative: (Please check!)

\frac {-x^2-4}{(x^2-4)^2}=0

-x^2-4=0

-x^2=4

x^2=-4

x=\sqrt{-4}

Correct me if I'm wrong, if you square root a negative number, wouldn't you have to use imaginary numbers (\imath)? Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivative method will not necessarily work when the function has asymptotes like this one. Find the asymptotes and then find the concavity for each area. Plot it out by find if it does not make sense.
Here is online graphing java applet to help out.
http://www.math.unl.edu/~jorr/java/html/Grapher.html
 
jzq said:
Sketch the graph of the function, using the curve-sketching guide.

Function: \frac {x}{x^2-4}

So far I have derived this information from the function: (Please check!)

First Derivative: f'(x)=\frac {-x^2-4}{(x^2-4)^2}
Second Derivative: f''(x)=\frac {2x(x^2+12)}{(x^2-4)^3}

The information that I need now is where it is increasing and decreasing; the relative minimum; where it concaves up and down; and the points of inflection. My problem is, when I plug in zero for y in the derivatives, it gets complicated.

You should stay in the real world, no complex numbers are needed. See f ' (x). It is always negative, it cannot be zero or positive. So your function is decreasing everywhere. It has neither local maxima nor minima.
f '' (x) is zero at x=0, and there are domains where it is either positive or negative, so the function has got an inflexion point and domains where it is concave up or down.


ehild
 
Here is (or at least should be) your graph...


Daniel.
 

Attachments

Davorak said:
The derivative method will not necessarily work when the function has asymptotes like this one. Find the asymptotes and then find the concavity for each area. Plot it out by find if it does not make sense.
Here is online graphing java applet to help out.
http://www.math.unl.edu/~jorr/java/html/Grapher.html
The way we're learning it, we're suppose to draw the graph w/o copying from a graphing calculator using the information derived from the function. After we found the derivatives, we have to set it = to 0, then find the critical numbers. With the critical numbers, we're then suppose to test it on a number line to find where it is positive or negative. From the first derivative number line, we find the decreasing and increasing intervals and the relative extrema. From the second derivative number line, we find the intervals where it concaves up and down and the points of inflection. I'm sure you all know this already. So basically, on my homework, I have to show how I got all my information. Thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top