How Do I Calculate Heat Transfer Through a Multi-Layered Ceiling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ziga Casar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Heat transfer
AI Thread Summary
To calculate heat transfer through a multi-layered ceiling, the indoor temperature is 21°C and outdoor temperature is 0°C, with specific thicknesses and thermal conductivities for concrete, air, and Armstrong plates provided. The formula Q = U S (T1-T2) is used, where U is derived from the sum of d/k and 1/alpha values. The challenge lies in determining the convection coefficients (alphas) for the air layers, particularly due to the natural air movement and temperature differences. There is confusion regarding the significant difference in calculated heat flux values, with conduction yielding 165.5W compared to 42,253W for concrete alone, raising questions about the role of convection. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for convection in heat transfer calculations to understand energy efficiency in ceiling design.
Ziga Casar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello guys,

I have a problem and I don't know how to solve it properly ...

So I have this situation:
armstrongplosca.png

And I must calculate the heat transfer (Q) through it ...

I know that the Indoor Temperature is 21C and the outdoor Temperature is 0C, I also know the following data for all layers:
Concrete: d (thickes) = 0.4m, k (Thermal conductivity) = 1.10 W/mK
Air: d = 2.25m, k = 0.0244 W/mK
Armstrong plate: d = 0.015m, k = 0.06 W/mK

And the surface is S = 731.9 m^2

I know I should calculate through this expression: Q = U S (T1-T2) and 1/U = SUM(d/k) = SUM(1/alpha)

the sum of d/k is no problem but for sum of 1/alpha, I do not know hot to calculate the alphas (Convection coefficient), because there is one alpha from air to Armstrong and one alpha from concrete to air (Or are there 2 alphas for each because the temperature under Armstrong plate is higher that the temperature above the Armstrong plate ...?)

So here is the problem, because there is a natural motion of air and a big horizontal plate I do not know hot to calculate the alphas... Can somebody please help me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You need to concentrate on what the variables represent - and think: resistors in series.
 
I do not exactly understand what you mean. Can you explain it a little bit better?
 
How would you find the current through resistors in series?
Now: heat flow = current, temperature difference voltage.
 
I completely understand the resistance circuits. But when I calculate the heat flux through the concrete only I get 42 253W, but when I calculate the heat flux through concrete, air and plate I get 165.5W. But this is only conduction, in real there is there also convection, and for convection I need alphas ... or is it not important to consider convection by calculating the heat flow?

I mean the heat flux difference is huge. I can not imagine that if you lower a ceiling with this plates you safe so much of energy? Air is a good isolator, but so good?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top