How do I calculate the moment of inertia for a hollow paper object?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia for a hollow paper block used in a trebuchet project. The original poster seeks guidance on the appropriate formula and method for this specific shape, which includes a long hollow arm with symmetrical trapezoidal sides. Participants emphasize the importance of defining a reference point for the calculation, suggesting that the fulcrum of the lever is a suitable choice for determining the moment of inertia. They recommend summing the moments of inertia of each face of the block relative to the chosen point, noting that the calculation involves the mass and radius squared for each face. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the object's shape and symmetry to facilitate accurate calculations.
Koolacc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am doing a physical project and i encountered a vital problem. I need to calculate the moment of inertia of hollow paper block(beam of a trebuchet(type of a catapult)). I was looking on the internet and there is no explanation of this particular case.
So, would anyone know how to calculate the moment of inertia for hollow paper object? (block, pyramid with no base and cut top with a hole in it for example)
Is there any formula for it?
Thanks for potential responses
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you could describe the shape a little more accurately or provide a drawing? For example, it's not clear from your description whether the shape has any type of symmetry which would be quite helpful in calculating the moment(s) of inertia.
 
Well first of all you need to define yourself some refrence point, as the moment of inertia is always relative to some point. Then ( I think), you can sum the moments of inertia of each face of the block relative to that point. So if its a cube, it requires finding the moment of inertia about each face individually, and then summing them up. I think this would work becuase the moment of inertia is just the sum of the mass times the radius squared, and you can do this for each face and sum the faces. This should yeild the same result. But have someone else verify what I am saying before you bother to do any calculation, I could be wrong.
 
Well, it is a long hollow paper arm(four sides), the two opposite are always identical trapezoids(symmetrical ones)
So, I can take any point? Well, I'll choose the fulcrum(it's a lever actually) as the point, that should be ok.
 
Just make sure to take it with respect to a point that is usefull! It does you no good to take it at a point that will not be where its rotating! You picked a very good point, as that would be were the motion would be about.
 
Ok, thanks to you both!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top