MHB How do I convert from this mod number to a regular number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SigmaS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Regular
SigmaS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So I was working on solving $(\frac{1}{4900})^{100}$, and I figured the only way to do this neatly is through modular arithmetic.

I found that $4900 \equiv 84 \ (\text {mod 112})$, so I concluded $$\frac{1^{100}}{84^{10}\times84^{10} \ (\text{mod 112})}$$

Which should equal $$\frac{1}{3.06\times10^{38} \ (\text{mod 112})}$$

Now, this is still in mod form. How do I convert that value to a regular number, by mostly hand? When I tried converting it with the equation $n=qm+r$ where n is the number we wish to convert to, q is our quotient, m is the mod we're using, and r is the remainder; solving for n I got 84, but that doesn't sound right at all.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi SigmaS,

What are you 'solving' exactly?
Are you trying to calculate $(4900^{-1})^{100}\pmod{112}$?
Or something else? If something else, where is the $112$ coming from?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Hi SigmaS,

What are you 'solving' exactly?
Are you trying to calculate $(4900^{-1})^{100}\pmod{112}$?
Or something else? If something else, where is the $112$ coming from?

The 112 was just arbitrarily determined. I wanted to make $4900^{100}$ easy to calculate by hand. And I'm just trying to solve the probability of the problem, but expressed in much simpler terms.

if there's a better way to solve the original problem without modular arithmetic, then that would be great
 
How about:
$$4900^{100}\approx (\frac 12\cdot 10^4)^{100}=\frac 1{(2^{10})^{10}}\cdot 10^{400}
=\frac 1{(1024)^{10}}\cdot 10^{400}\approx \frac 1{10^{30}}\cdot 10^{400}=1\cdot10^{370}$$
? (Wondering)
 
Sixty years ago, this would have been an easy exercise in logarithms. $\log49 \approx 1.690196$, so $\log4900 \approx 3.690196$, and $\log(4900^{100}) \approx 369.0196$. Now take the antilog, to get $4900^{100}\approx 1.046\times 10^{369}.$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top