How do I draw a free body diagram of a car on a slope?

AI Thread Summary
To draw a free body diagram of a car on a slope, it is essential to identify the forces acting on the car: weight, normal force, and friction. The weight acts downward, while the normal force is perpendicular to the slope. Friction, contrary to initial assumptions, acts upwards along the hill when the car is attempting to accelerate upward, countering the downward force of gravity. The engine's torque affects the frictional force but is not considered an external force in the free body diagram since it operates within the system. Understanding these forces clarifies how they interact to determine the car's maximum acceleration up the slope.
Chozen Juan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car attempts to accelerate up a hill at an angle θ to the horizontal. The coefficient of static friction between the tires and the hill is µ > tan θ. What is the maximum acceleration the car can achieve (in the direction upwards along the hill)? Neglect the rotational inertia of the wheels.

#8 on this website: https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2010/upload/2010_Fma.pdf

Homework Equations


ΣF = ma
f_k = μN

The Attempt at a Solution


I first started by drawing a free-body diagram. I knew that there had to be a weight force on the car acting downward, so I drew it. The other obvious force is the normal force, which acts perpendicular to the surface. Now, I first thought that there should also be an external applied force on the car acting in the direction upwards along the hill. I also reasoned that in the direction of motion is upwards along the hill, then there should be a friction force in the direction directly opposite the driving force. I tried solving for a, the maximum acceleration of the car, but I couldn't because I didn't have enough information:N-mgcos(θ) = 0 ⇒ N = mgcos(θ)

f_k = μN ⇒ f_k = μ(mgcos(θ))(F_applied) - mgsin(θ) - μ(mgcos(θ)) = ma

a = ((F_applied) - mgsin(θ) - μ(mgcos(θ)))/(m)The above equation for a is simply incorrect; even if I found out the value of (F_applied) or if I found out (F_applied) in terms of some other variables, the answer would be incorrect. Because of this, i suspected that perhaps the applied force of the engine is for some reason some internal force of the system that cancels out with another force to become zero. Then, I considered the possibility of friction acting in the direction of motion, opposite the direction of mgsin(θ). One reason why I thought kinetic friction would act in the direction of motion is that the rear tire has a tendency to rotate clockwise. I then tried solving the problem again with these new forces, and I got the correct answer:

N = mgcos(θ)
f_k = μ(mgcos(θ))

μ(mgcos(θ)) - mgsin(θ) = ma

a = (μ(mgcos(θ)) - mgsin(θ))/(m) ⇒ a = g(µ cos(θ) − sin(θ))

Although this is the correct answer, I still am not sure if my second approach to the problem is correct. If it is the correct attempt, I still don't conceptually understand why there is no applied force in the free body diagram. Also, I don't exactly fully understand why the friction is propelling the car forward; it would make more intuitive sense to me if friction were to be in the opposite direction of the car's motion.

How can I fully conceptually understand how the forces act on this system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chozen Juan said:
Although this is the correct answer, I still am not sure if my second approach to the problem is correct. If it is the correct attempt, I still don't conceptually understand why there is no applied force in the free body diagram. Also, I don't exactly fully understand why the friction is propelling the car forward; it would make more intuitive sense to me if friction were to be in the opposite direction of the car's motion.
Hello.

The second approach is correct. The acceleration of the car is due to external forces only. These are the forces "applied" to the car. What are the external forces acting on the car? You should be able to list these forces and state what objects external to the car create these forces.

If something tries to slide down a slope, what direction does friction act on the object?
 
Ok, the external forces acting on the car would be Weight, Normal force, and friction force. The weight is the force of Earth on the car, the normal force is a force of the surface on the car, and the friction force is another force of the surface on the car. These are the only external forces, but I still don't understand why we don't consider the force of the engine on the car an external force.Since the car has a tendency to slide down the ramp due to its weight, the friction force should be in the direction upwards along the hill.

But why is the force of the engine on the car not external?

Also, in my mind, it only makes sense to say that the friction acts upwards along the hill if the car is not moving upwards... but that is only if the car has zero applied force from the engine. I don't understand why the friction force would act in the same direction even if the car has a force from the engine propelling it upwards.
 
Chozen Juan said:
Ok, the external forces acting on the car would be Weight, Normal force, and friction force. The weight is the force of Earth on the car, the normal force is a force of the surface on the car, and the friction force is another force of the surface on the car. These are the only external forces, but I still don't understand why we don't consider the force of the engine on the car an external force.Since the car has a tendency to slide down the ramp due to its weight, the friction force should be in the direction upwards along the hill.

But why is the force of the engine on the car not external?

Also, in my mind, it only makes sense to say that the friction acts upwards along the hill if the car is not moving upwards... but that is only if the car has zero applied force from the engine. I don't understand why the friction force would act in the same direction even if the car has a force from the engine propelling it upwards.
The engine of a car doesn't apply a direct force to the driving wheels; it supplies a torque, which is then transmitted by the axles to the driving wheels. The friction between the tires and the road surface permit this torque from the driving wheels to move the car without the wheels slipping on the road surface.
 
The car is a complicated system of parts that move relative to one another. However, you are only interested in the motion of the center of mass of the car. Only external forces affect the motion of the center of mass of a system. By definition, external forces are forces due to objects outside the system.

However, the engine does affect the tendency of the wheels to slip on the ground. As the engine applies more torque to the wheels, there is a greater tendency for the wheels to slip which causes the static friction between the wheels and the ground to increase. So, the amount of external force of friction is affected by the internal forces.

It's similar to when you walk up a hill. If you stand on the slope of the hill, friction between your feet and the ground prevent you from sliding down the hill. As you start to walk up the hill, you push your foot so that you increase how much your foot pushes down the hill (parallel to the slope). The reaction force from the hill on your foot is up the hill.

The wheels of the car and your feet are acting similarly.
 

Attachments

  • Foot wheel.png
    Foot wheel.png
    13.5 KB · Views: 556
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top