How Do I Draw a Scale Diagram for Two Forces Acting on an Object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicshelpneeded
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram Scale
AI Thread Summary
To draw a scale diagram for two forces acting on an object, start by representing each force as a vector, ensuring their lengths are proportional to their magnitudes. For instance, if the 8 N force is represented by a 2-inch arrow, the 12 N force should be a 3-inch arrow. Draw the first vector, then place the tail of the second vector at the tip of the first to find the resultant vector. The net force direction and magnitude can be determined by drawing a vector from the tail of the first to the tip of the second. This method effectively visualizes the combined effect of the two forces.
Physicshelpneeded
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
hey all...

Im having trouble with a question here that asks when only 2 forces act on an object (1: 8.0 to the right, 2: 12.0 N to the left) draw a scale diagram to determine the magnitude and direction of the resulting NET force.

anyone know how to do this?
anyone know how to draw a scale diagram PERIOD?

My professor forgot to explain this part but of course expects me to know the answer and do the homework correctly :frown: :mad:

anyways, thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He wants you to add those force vectors graphically: draw the first vector, then draw the second vector by placing its tail at the tip of the first vector, the sum is a vector from the tail of the first to the tip of the second. (Check your book if that's not clear.)

To add them properly, make sure that each vector is drawn to scale: that just means the length of the arrow should be proportional to the magnitude of the vector. For example: if you represent the 8 N force with an arrow 2 inches long, then the 12 N force better be an arrow 3 inches long.
 
wow, thanks a lot Doctor Al...that really helped me alot! :biggrin: ill do everything u suggested and see how it works out - thanks again :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top