How do I evaluate <x> with the k-space representation?

Cracker Jack
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the following k-space representation of the wave function:
Ψ(k,t) = Ψ(k)e-iħk2t/2m

use the wave number representation to show the following:

<x>t=<x>0 + <p>0t/m

<p>t=<p>0

Homework Equations


<x>=∫Ψ*(x,t)xΨ(x,t)dx
<p>=∫Ψ*(x,t)(-iħ ∂/∂x)Ψ(x,t)dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to make the k-space representation into the normal Ψ(x,t) representation then taking Ψ*(x,t) and taking that integral where Ψ(x,t)=1/√(2pi)∫Ψ(k)e-iħk2t/2m*ei(kx-ħk2t/2m)dkHowever, I get caught up when calculating <x> at the following integral: <x>=1/2pi*∫∫(Ψ*(k)Ψ(k) x dk)dx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cracker Jack said:
Ψ(x,t)=1/√(2pi)∫Ψ(k)e-iħk2t/2m*ei(kx-ħk2t/2m)dk
You don't need to do that calculation because you are asked to compute the integral in the k space, and you have also been given the state in k space.
Cracker Jack said:
<x>=1/2pi*∫∫(Ψ*(k)Ψ(k) x dk)dx
Your equation is not correct. Even if you want to do the integral in x space by first expressing ##\psi(x,t)## in its Fourier integral, there should be three integral signs appearing there. But again you don't need to do this. Simply calculate
$$
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^*(k,t)x\psi(x,t) \hspace{2mm}dk
$$
Your first task is to find out how the operator ##x## acts in k space.
Hint: the expression of ##x## in k space is similar to that of ##p## in position space.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
You don't need to do that calculation because you are asked to compute the integral in the k space, and you have also been given the state in k space.

Your equation is not correct. Even if you want to do the integral in x space by first expressing ##\psi(x,t)## in its Fourier integral, there should be three integral signs appearing there. But again you don't need to do this. Simply calculate
$$
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^*(k,t)x\psi(x,t) \hspace{2mm}dk
$$
Your first task is to find out how the operator ##x## acts in k space.
Hint: the expression of ##x## in k space is similar to that of ##p## in position space.
Thank you, I think this helps. I was thinking x could only act on Ψ if it was Ψ(x,t). Looking through lecture notes, I think that x operates in k space as i∂/∂k. Is that correct?
 
Cracker Jack said:
I think that x operates in k space as i∂/∂k. Is that correct?
Yes correct.
Cracker Jack said:
I was thinking x could only act on Ψ if it was Ψ(x,t).
States are vector in vector space and the operators are the linear maps in the vector space. Since vector space can have more than one bases, the operators can also have different form depending on which bases being used. When position bases is being used ##x## becomes simply a number, in k space ##x## acts such that it has the form you wrote there.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Yes correct.

States are vector in vector space and the operators are the linear maps in the vector space. Since vector space can have more than one bases, the operators can also have different form depending on which bases being used. When position bases is being used ##x## becomes simply a number, in k space ##x## acts such that it has the form you wrote there.
Thank you this helped a lot, and now I think I've gotten the right answer.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top