How do I find the other charge using electric potential?

AI Thread Summary
To find the other charge using electric potential, the relevant equation is not k|q1||q2|/r^2, but rather the expression for electric potential due to point charges. The potential at a point is the sum of the potentials from each charge, which should be set equal to the given potential of 7.68 V. The calculation must begin with the correct formula for electric potential, which involves the individual charges and their distances from the point of interest. It’s essential to show detailed calculations to identify any errors in the approach. Correctly applying the principles of electric potential will lead to the solution for the unknown charge.
moeug1999
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The potential equals 7.68 V at the midpoint between two point charges that are 1.11 m apart. One of the charges is 1.06 10-9 C. Find the value of the other charge.
Relevant Equations
I assume the k|q1||q2|/r^2
I tried looking for the other charge using the equation k|q1||q2|/r^2 but it tells me that my answer is wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moeug1999 said:
Homework Statement:: The potential equals 7.68 V at the midpoint between two point charges that are 1.11 m apart. One of the charges is 1.06 10-9 C. Find the value of the other charge.
Relevant Equations:: I assume the k|q1||q2|/r^2

I tried looking for the other charge using the equation k|q1||q2|/r^2 but it tells me that my answer is wrong
Please show us your detailed calculation so we can check it for you. Thanks. :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Please show us your detailed calculation so we can check it for you. Thanks. :smile:
here's my attempt
 

Attachments

  • unnamed.jpg
    unnamed.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 159
moeug1999 said:
Relevant Equations:: I assume the k|q1||q2|/r^2
What you have there is irrelevant to this problem. Not only that but it's not even an equation. Your attempt in post #3 shows a bunch of numbers without a starting equation. This problem is about the electric potential due to point charges. What is a general expression for that? That should be your starting point.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top